Recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to promoter regions is essential for transcription. Despite conflicting evidence, the Pol II Pre-Initiation Complex (PIC) is often thought to be of uniform composition and assemble at all promoters via an identical mechanism. Here, we show using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells as a model that promoter classes with distinct functions and initiation patterns function via PICs that display different compositions and dependencies: developmental promoter DNA readily associates with the canonical Pol II PIC, whereas housekeeping promoters do not and instead recruit different factors such as DREF. Consistently, TBP and DREF are required by distinct sets of promoters, and TBP and its paralog TRF2 function at different promoter types, partly exclusively and partly redundantly. In contrast, TFIIA is required for transcription from all promoters, and we identify factors that can recruit and/or stabilize TFIIA at housekeeping promoters and activate transcription. We show that promoter activation by these factors is sufficient to induce the dispersed transcription initiation patterns characteristic of housekeeping promoters. Thus, different promoter classes direct distinct mechanisms of transcription initiation, which relate to different focused versus dispersed initiation patterns.

Recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to promoters is essential for transcription. Despite conflicting evidence, the Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC) is often thought to have a uniform composition and to assemble at all promoters via an identical mechanism. Here, using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells as a model, we demonstrate that different promoter classes function via distinct PICs. Promoter DNA of developmentally regulated genes readily associates with the canonical Pol II PIC, whereas housekeeping promoters do not, and instead recruit other factors such as DREF. Consistently, TBP and DREF are differentially required by distinct promoter types. TBP and its paralog TRF2 also function at different promoter types in a partially redundant manner. In contrast, TFIIA is required at all promoters, and we identify factors that can recruit and/or stabilize TFIIA at housekeeping promoters and activate transcription. Promoter activation by tethering these factors is sufficient to induce the dispersed transcription initiation patterns characteristic of housekeeping promoters. Thus, different promoter classes utilize distinct mechanisms of transcription initiation, which translate into different focused versus dispersed initiation patterns.

No abstract