Intestinal failure is a serious complication of conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease, mesenteric ischemia, and radiation enteritis--and of extensive bowel resection performed because of these diseases. Imbalances of fluids and electrolytes and poor nutritional status manifest as chronic diarrhea or increased ostomy output. Prompt referral to a center specializing in intestinal rehabilitation is key to achieving nutritional homeostasis and, in some cases, can help the patient return to oral food intake. We review the intestinal sequelae of bowel resection and provide an update on intestinal rehabilitation with dietary modification, drug therapy, and parenteral nutrition. We also review current experience with intestinal transplant, a potentially lifesaving option in select patients when intestinal rehabilitation fails or parenteral nutrition causes severe complications.

No abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend that patients with chronic intestinal failure (CIF) should be managed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). However, the characteristics of real-world IF centers and the patients they care for are lacking. The study aims to describe IF center characteristics as well as characteristics of patients with CIF across different global regions.Methods: This is an international multicenter study of adult IF centers using a survey. The questionnaire survey included questions regarding program and patient characteristics. Thirty-three investigational centers were invited to participate. Each center was asked to answer the survey questions as one MDT. Results: The survey center response rate was 91%. The median number of patients with CIF per center was 128 (range, 30-380). The most common disciplines reported were gastroenterologist (93%), dietitian (90%), nurse (83%), and advanced practitioner (nurse practitioner and physician assistant, 77%).

Background: Registered dietitian nutritionists subjectively assess muscle loss as part of the nutrition-focused physical examination (NFPE), using guidelines to standardize malnutrition diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) scans provide an objective measure of skeletal muscle mass and abdominal wall and visceral adipose tissue and can be used to determine skeletal muscle loss.Methods: In this retrospective review, our team compared muscle measurements including the psoas, paraspinal muscles, and abdominal wall muscle area at the level of the third lumbar vertebral body (using CT)-as well as visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue measurements-before and after gut transplant with the malnutrition diagnosis found on the NFPE. We also examined the association between CT measurements and postoperative infection, length of stay, and mortality.Results: Forty-two patients were included in the study. Adipose tissue measurements on CT analysis were significantly lower in the malnutrition group compared with those without malnutrition (P ≤ 0.05) in both the pretransplant and posttransplant groups. Skeletal muscle size measurements were not significantly associated with malnutrition, but when adjusted for patients' height by calculating skeletal muscle index, an association between low skeletal muscle index scores and malnutrition diagnosis was found (P = 0.026). Pretransplant malnutrition diagnosis did not predict infection, length of stay, or mortality. Conclusion:Objective assessment of subcutaneous adipose tissue by CT analysis was significantly correlated with the subjective assessment of malnutrition by NFPE in both pretransplant and posttransplant patients. Skeletal muscle index scores were significantly lower in pretransplant patients who were diagnosed with malnutrition.

Background: International practice guidelines for high-stool-output (HSO) management in short bowel syndrome (SBS) are available, but data on implementation are lacking. This study describes the approach used to manage HSO in SBS patients across different global regions. Methods: This is an international multicenter study evaluating medical management of HSO in SBS patients using a questionnaire survey. Thirty-three intestinal-failure centers were invited to complete the survey as one multidisciplinary team. Results: Survey response rate was 91%. Dietary recommendations varied based on anatomy and geographic region. For patients without colon-in-continuity (CiC), clinical practices were generally consistent with ESPEN guidelines, including separation of fluid from solid food (90%), a high-sodium diet (90%), and a low-simple-sugar diet (75%). For CiC patients, practices less closely followed guidelines, such as a low-fat diet (35%) or a high-sodium diet (50%). First-line antimotility and antisecretory medications were loperamide and proton-pump inhibitors. Other therapeutic agents (e.g., pancreatic enzymes and bile acid binders) were utilized in real-world practices, and usage varied based on intestinal anatomy. Conclusion: Expert centers largely followed published HSO-management guidelines for SBS patients without CiC, but clinical practices deviated substantially for CiC patients. Determining the reasons for this discrepancy might inform future development of practice guidelines.