Traditional evaluation tools are oftentimes ill-suited for use in community settings where intervention outcomes of interest may occur at multiple levels and are influenced by interacting factors. Ripple effects mapping (REM) is a participatory technique engaging stakeholders to visually map project/program efforts and results to collect impact data. Using appreciative inquiry, the method helps participants and evaluators understand context for changes resulting from program experiences and is particularly well suited for community-based, participatory programs where impacts often occur beyond the individual level. This article describes the REM method and how it was applied to explore impact and refine program theory of the Extension Wellness Ambassador Program (EWAP), a community-based health-focused master volunteer program, from the perspective of program implementers ( n = 10). Insights emerging from the REM session indicate EWAP promotes health behavior change, contributes to community development due to increased leadership capacity, and sustains and grows implementing organizations. The program theory shaping evaluation was refined to better capture impact beyond individual levels. Application of the REM method to a community health program demonstrates feasibility; health promotion practitioners should consider REM to understand program context and capture outcomes that typically evade measurement using traditional techniques.

No abstract

Program continuance was significantly and positively associated with lay leader use. Lay delivery expanded access to strength training programs and increased the likelihood that programs would continue. This approach can be used to increase access to and sustainability of strength training programs, particularly in resource-constrained areas.

IntroductionWorsening of the opioid epidemic amplifies calls for involvement of the nationwide Cooperative Extension System (Extension) in addressing this crisis. Understanding knowledge and attitudes among Extension professionals who directly interact with communities is critical given identified needs for increased capacity and substantial federal investments supporting Extension's opioid response. This study explored opioid knowledge and attitudes among Extension professionals in one state to identify attitudes and perceptions that may influence community-level efforts.MethodsAn online survey including 25 Likert scale questions about attitudes and beliefs related to substance use was administered to Extension professionals. Questions were categorized into five concept areas: treatment and community support, legal and punitive approaches, substance use as an illness, external causes of substance use, and personal causes of substance use. Descriptive statistics and response frequencies for all variables were calculated. One-way ANOVAs were used to calculate geographic differences between the state's three Extension regions.ResultsSurvey responses (n = 236) indicated respondents recognized the complexity of the opioid crisis and had favorable attitudes toward treatment and community support approaches. Support for legal and punitive approaches was mixed, as were attitudes toward external and personal causes of substance use. Most indicated needing better resources and more knowledge to engage in work locally.ConclusionIncreased capacity is needed in Extension to adequately support families and communities dealing with substance use disorder. Findings suggest areas of focus and provide insight for others seeking to develop capacity in opioid response by engaging Extension professionals or other community outreach workers in substance use prevention efforts.

No abstract