The detection of speci®c IgM antibodies has been the most frequently used serological marker for diagnosing recent toxoplasmosis. However, the persistence of speci®c IgM antibodies in some patients and the use of tests with a low speci®city have complicated the interpretation of serological results when toxoplasmosis is suspected. The purpose of the present study was to determine the value of newer serological techniques in the diagnosis of acute acquired toxoplasmosis. Sixty-four sera, 31 from patients with Toxoplasma gondii infection and 33 from patients with latent infection, were tested. Anti-T. gondii IgA was measured by two antibody capture ELISA tests (Platelia 1 Toxo IgA and ETI-TOXOK A) and an automated direct ELISA (IMx 1 Toxo IgA); all three assays detected antibody levels compatible with a recent infection in sera from all 31 patients with acute toxoplasmosis. However, signi®cant levels of IgA were also detected with high frequency by all three assays in sera from patients with latent infection. IgE antibodies detected by IgE immunosorbent agglutination assay (ISAGA) were present in 26 (84%) of 31 patients with acute toxoplasmosis and in sera from two subjects with latent infection taken >1 year after the beginning of the clinical symptoms of infection. Thirty (97%) of 31 patients with a recent T. gondii infection and 15 (45%) of 33 subjects with latent infection had an AC/HS pattern compatible with acute toxoplasmosis. The avidity of T. gondii IgG was evaluated by two methods. One method was based on the titration of each serum sample and calculation of the titres, in the absence and presence of urea, in relation to a de®ned cut-off value. In the other method, a single serum dilution was used and the absorbances of the reactions in the presence and absence of urea were compared. The titration method was more sensitive for diagnosing recent primary infection; all 31 sera from patients with acute toxoplasmosis had avidity indices compatible with acute toxoplasmosis by the titration method, whereas with the single dilution method, sera from four patients had equivocal results. In the 33 individuals with latent infection, similar results were obtained with the two avidity methods; only one serum sample had a non-compatible avidity value with the titration method. The results obtained in the present study show that the current serological markers used for diagnosing acute acquired toxoplasmosis have signi®cant limitations. The data suggest that determination of the avidity of T. gondii-speci®c IgG by the titration method in patients with detectable IgM antibodies de®nes most accurately the stage of infection by T. gondii.

SUMMARYWe report the detection of specific IgA antibodies and the determination of IgG avidity in sequential serum samples from a patient exhibiting significant levels of Toxoplasma-specific IgM antibodies for seven years after the onset of the clinical symptoms of toxoplasmosis. IgM antibodies were detected by an indirect immunofluorescence test and by three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Anti-T. gondii IgA was quantified by the α-capture ELISA technique using a commercial kit. As defined by the manufacturer of the IgA ELISA test used, most patients with acute toxoplasmosis have antibody levels > 40 arbitrary units per ml (AU/mL). At this cut-off level, the patient still had a positive ELISA result (45 AU/mL) in a serum sample taken one year after the beginning of clinical manifestations. The IgG avidity-ELISA test was performed with the Falcon assay screening test (F.A.S.T.

No abstract

ABSTRACT

These results show that IgA is not a dependable marker for a recently acquired primary Toxoplasma infection.