No abstract

Although monotherapy with angiostatic drugs is still far from effective, there is abundant evidence that angiostatic therapy can improve the efficacy of conventional treatments like radiotherapy. This has instigated numerous efforts to optimize and clinically implement the combination of angiostatic drugs with radiation treatment. The results from past and present clinical trials that explored this combination therapy indeed show encouraging results. However, current findings also show that the combination has variable efficacy and is associated with increased toxicity. This indicates that combining radiotherapy with angiostatic drugs not only holds opportunities but also provides several challenges. In the current review, we provide an update of the most recent insights from clinical trials that evaluated the combination of angiostatic drugs with radiation treatment. In addition, we discuss the outstanding questions for future studies in order to improve the clinical benefit of combining angiostatic therapy with radiation therapy.

2547 Background: Bringing precision medicine to cancer patients remains a challenge. For many cancers, the relative contribution of tumor type, mutations or CNV to drug sensitivity remains unknown. In addition, drug access is generally limited to the labeled indication, bypassing rarer disease subgroups for which large trials are not feasible. An innovative trial that facilitates drug access, whilst systematically analyzing treatment outcomes and biomarkers, could help overcome these challenges. Methods: We designed a prospective, non randomized clinical trial in which patients with advanced cancer are treated with targeted or immunotherapy matched to their tumor profile, defined by genetic aberration, microsatellite instability (MSI) or high mutational load (HML). Upon a mandatory pre-treatment tumor biopsy for biomarker research, patients are enrolled in multiple parallel cohorts, each defined by study drug, histologic tumor type and molecular tumor profile. Efficacy is analyzed per cohort, enrolling 8 patients in stage I and 16 more in stage II if ≥1 response is observed in stage I. Study endpoints include objective tumor response (CR or PR), stable disease (SD) at 16 weeks and grade≥3 adverse events. The DRUP is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02925234). Results: Since start of recruitment in Sep 2016, 76 patients have been submitted for review (mean per month 15, range 8-17) and 16 (21%) have started treatment in 10 different cohorts, directed at either ATM (n = 1; breast cancer), BRAF (n = 2; salivary duct carcinoma and ACUP), BRCA (n = 1; breast cancer), ERBB2 (n = 2; CRC), HML (n = 2; prostate and CRC), MSI (n = 5; CRC, GBM and urothelial carcinoma), RET (n = 1; NSCLC) or RAS-RAFwt (n = 2; SCC and sarcoma). Out of the 7 patients for whom response evaluation is available, PR (n = 2) or SD at 16 weeks (n = 1) was observed in 3 (43%). Thirteen study drugs (supplied by 6 pharmaceutical companies) are currently available, 6 more are expected soon. Conclusions: Execution of a nationwide multidrug precision oncology trial is feasible. It contributes to oncologists’ education on molecularly targeted therapies and to identification of early signs of activity in rare cancer subsets. Data sharing with similar studies such as TAPUR and CAPTUR will help to enlarge cohorts and affirm conclusions. Clinical trial information: NCT02925234.