We performed a prospective study to evaluate the normal changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in the forearm, hip, spine and total body, and to study the agreement between changes in BMD estimated from cross-sectional data and the actual longitudinal changes. Six hundred and twenty subjects (398 women, 222 men; age 20-89 years) without diseases or medication known to affect bone metabolism undertook baseline evaluations, and 525 (336 women, 189 men) completed the study. BMD was measured twice 2 years apart by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. From cross-sectional evaluations the only premenopausal bone loss (<0.003 g/cm2/year) was found in the hip. In women after menopause and in men an age-related bone loss (0.002-0.006 g/cm2/year) was found at all sites. The data from the longitudinal evaluation showed a small bone loss in women before menopause at the hip and lumbar spine (<0.4%/year (<0.004 g/cm2/year)); this bone loss nearly tripled in the early postmenopausal years (<10 years since menopause), and thereafter decreased to the premenopausal rate for the hip, and to zero for the lumbar spine. The most pronounced bone loss after menopause occurred in the forearm (1.2%/year (0.006 g/ cm2/year)), and it remained constant throughout life. In men there was a small longitudinal bone loss in the hip throughout life, and a small bone loss in the distal forearm after the age of 50 years. In all groups, except for the early postmenopausal women, we found a small increase in total body BMD with age. When comparing the changes in BMD estimated from cross-sectional data with the longitudinal changes, only the hip and forearm generally displayed agreement, whereas the changes in the total body and spine generally were incongruous. In conclusion, the hip and forearm appear to be the sites with the best agreement between the cross-sectional estimated and the longitudinal age-related changes in BMD.
The World Health Organisation (WHO) has proposed a set of guidelines for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in adult women based on a measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) expressed as the number of SD below young adult mean (t-score). In this study, we investigated the number of subjects classified as either osteopenic or osteoporotic according to these guidelines using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), at the hip, at the spine and at the lower forearm and quantitative ultrasound (QUS), at the heel. A total of 247 men, 209 postmenopausal women and 195 premenopausal women were included in the study. Furthermore, the study provides the first normative data showing the influence of sex, age and menopause on broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS), as measured by the DTU-one imaging ultrasound scanner. The difference between the number of patients classified into either diagnosis group by the investigated parameters is large ranging from 25.9% of the women being diagnosed as osteopenic by BUA at the heel to 43.0% by BMD at the femoral neck. For men, the same range is from 20.5% by BUA to 44.1% by BMD at the femoral neck. For the classification into the osteoporotic group, the range is from 2.5% by intertrochanteric BMD to 24.4% by BMD at Ward's triangle for women and from 0% by SOS to 29.0% by BMD at Ward's triangle for men. Using total hip BMD as the reference parameter to categorize the subjects as normal, osteopenic or osteoporotic, the agreement of the other parameters with this classification is assessed in terms of sensitivity and specificity. We conclude that there are significant differences in the classification of osteoporosis/osteopenia depending on the site measured and the technique used for the bone mass assessment. Furthermore, we suggest that development of technique and site specific cut-off values may increase the accuracy of the classification of osteoporosis/osteopenia in both men and women.
The combination of 17beta-estradiol and drospirenone has a positive effect on BMD and a potentially beneficial effect on lipids. Although endometrial thickness increased slightly, the safety of the endometrium was assured, as no cases of hyperplasia or cancer occurred.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.