Basalt microfiber‐reinforced polyurethane elastomer composites (BMF/PUE) were prepared by semi‐prepolymer method in this study. The degree of microphase separation and quantitative analysis of H‐bonding formation in polyurethane were determined by infrared spectroscopy. The fiber surface and the morphology at the tensile fracture interface of the composite materials were observed by scanning electron microscopy. The mechanical properties of composite materials were further measured on an electronic universal testing machine. Dynamic thermomechanical analysis and acoustic impedance tube were used to study the damping and acoustic properties of composite materials, respectively. The results indicated that the composite material prepared by adding 6 g of basalt microfibers treated with 3 min' crushing had the best overall performance. Compared with the matrix, BMF/PUE showed good sound insulation performance with a much wider effective damping temperature range. On the basis of ensuring its excellent overall performance, the mechanical properties were increased by 50.4% in tensile strength, 28.1% in elongation at break, and 14.2% in tear strength.

The non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of double-crystallizable poly(ethylene glycol)–poly(l-lactide) diblock copolymer (PEG-PLLA) and poly(ethylene glycol) homopolymer (PEG) were studied using the fast cooling rate provided by a Fast-Scan Chip-Calorimeter (FSC). The experimental data were analyzed by the Ozawa method and the Kissinger equation. Additionally, the total crystallization rate was represented by crystallization half time t1/2. The Ozawa method is a perfect success because secondary crystallization is inhibited by using fast cooling rate. The first crystallized PLLA block provides nucleation sites for the crystallization of PEG block and thus promotes the crystallization of the PEG block, which can be regarded as heterogeneous nucleation to a certain extent, while the method of the PEG block and PLLA block crystallized together corresponds to a one-dimensional growth, which reflects that there is a certain separation between the crystallization regions of the PLLA block and PEG block. Although crystallization of the PLLA block provides heterogeneous nucleation conditions for PEG block to a certain extent, it does not shorten the time of the whole crystallization process because of the complexity of the whole crystallization process including nucleation and growth.

The non-isothermal crystallization behaviors of poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) and poly (ethylene glycol)-b-poly(ε-caprolactone) (PEG-PCL) were investigated through a commercially available chip-calorimeter Flash DSC2+. The non-isothermal crystallization data under different cooling rates were analyzed by the Ozawa model, modified Avrami model, and Mo model. The results of the non-isothermal crystallization showed that the PCL block crystallized first, followed by the crystallization of the PEG block when the cooling rate was 50–200 K/s. However, only the PEG block can crystallize when the cooling rate is 300–600 K/s. The crystallization of PEG-PCL is completely inhibited when the cooling rate is 1000 K/s. The modified Avrami and Ozawa models were found to describe the non-isothermal crystallization processes well. The growth methods of PEG and PEG-PCL are both three-dimensional spherulitic growth. The Mo model shows that the crystallization rate of PEG is greater than that of PEG-PCL.

No abstract