Recibido el 3 de abril de 2014; aceptado el 4 de agosto de 2014 Disponible en Internet el 21 de abril de 2015 PALABRAS CLAVE Sueño; Factores de riesgo cardiovascular; Enfermedades cardiovasculares; Síndrome metabólico ResumenIntroducción: El síndrome de apnea/hipopnea obstructiva del sueño, es una entidad que ha cobrado importancia en los últimos años, con una prevalencia estimada en adultos de edad media cercana al 4 y al 2% en hombres y mujeres, respectivamente, y que por su frecuencia constituye un problema de salud pública. Objetivo: Exponer, tras un análisis exhaustivo de la literatura disponible, la asociación entre el síndrome de apnea/hipopnea obstructiva del sueño y las enfermedades cardiovasculares. Método: Se hizo una revisión narrativa a partir de la literatura encontrada en las bases de datos más reconocidas. Se incluyeron 59 estudios publicados en los últimos treinta años y se excluyeron reportes y series de casos. Conclusiones: El síndrome de apnea/hipopnea obstructiva del sueño se reconoce hoy en día como un problema de salud pública mundial. En Latinoamérica, más específicamente en Colombia, se requieren estudios prospectivos de cohorte que sirvan de pauta para la población del continente e indiquen posibles diferencias respecto a la comunidad internacional en cuanto a su tratamiento y diagnóstico oportunos, así como acerca del impacto de estos en lo concerniente a los desenlaces cardiovasculares de los pacientes.

No abstract

Background-Current guidelines recommend the new-generation P2Y12-inhibitor ticagrelor for patients with acute ST-segmentelevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs). The aim of the present study was to assess efficacy and safety of ticagrelor for elderly patients with STEMI (≥75 years) in an all-comers STEMI registry. Methods and Results-Patients with STEMI, aged ≥75 years, treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and documented in the Bremen STEMI Registry between 2006 and 2017 entered analysis. The primary efficacy outcome, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, was defined as a composite of death, myocardial reinfarction, and stroke. The safety outcome was defined as any significant bleeding event within 1 year. To estimate benefit/risk ratio, net adverse clinical events (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events+bleedings) were calculated. Outcomes were estimated in propensity scorematched cohorts to adjust for possible confounders. Of a total of 7466 patients with STEMI, 1087, aged ≥75 years, were selected, of which 552 (51%) received clopidogrel and 535 (49%) received ticagrelor, with similar age (80.9AE4.6 versus 80.9AE4.6 years) and sex (51% versus 50% female) distributions between treatment arms. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 32.4% of patients treated with clopidogrel versus 25.5% treated with ticagrelor (P=0.015), with the 1-year mortality rate at 26.8% versus 21.1% (P=0.035). Because there was no difference in the safety outcome (clopidogrel versus ticagrelor, 4.9% versus 5.1%; not significant), net adverse clinical events were higher for clopidogrel than for ticagrelor: 37.3% versus 30.6% (P=0.028). In a propensity scorematched model, the advantage for ticagrelor on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events remained significant (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.97; P=0.03), whereas 1-year-mortality (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.67-1.27; P=0.5) and 1-year bleeding events (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.4-2.3; P=0.8) did not differ. Conclusions-These results from propensity score-matched registry data show that for elderly patients with STEMI, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel was associated with a reduction in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events without a significant increase in bleeding events within 1 year.

No abstract