No abstract

The company is an organizational body that has an important role in the economic development of a country, especially for investors. The purpose of this study was to analyze and test the effect of EPS, DER on stock returns with dividend policy as an intervening variable. The population in this study are banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2018-2020. The sampling technique was determined by purposive sampling. Data analysis and hypothesis testing in this study used the Structural Equation Model – Partial Least Square (PLS-SEM). The results of the direct influence hypothesis test using the Smart PLS 3.0 application, show that EPS has a significant effect on dividend policy, DER has a significant effect on dividend policy, EPS has a significant effect on stock returns, DER has a significant effect on stock returns, dividend policy has a significant effect on stock returns. The results of the indirect effect hypothesis test show that the EPS variable on stock returns through dividend policy has a significant positive effect, DER on stock returns through dividend policy has a significant negative effect.

This study aims (1) to determine the effect of Capital Adequacy Levels (CAR), Operational Efficiency (OEOI), Credit Risk (NPF) and Liquidity (FDR) partially on Profitability (ROA), (2) to determine the effect of the effect of Capital Adequacy Levels (CAR), Operational efficiency (OEOI), Credit risk (NPF) and Liquidity (FDR) simultaneously on Profitability (ROA), and (3) to determine which of the effect of Capital Adequacy Levels (CAR), Operational efficiency (OEOI), Credit risk (NPF) and Liquidity (FDR) has the most influence on Profitability (ROA) in Islamic banking registered with the OJK for the period 2015-2019. The method used in this research is quantitative method. The result of research is multiple linear regression equation Y = 21,756 + 0,11X1 - 0,349X2 + 0,507X3 + 0,117X4 + e. Partially CAR has no significant effect on the ROA, OEOI has a significant negative effect on the ROA, NPF and FDR has a significant positive effect on the ROA. Simultaneously CAR, OEOI, NPF and FDR partially to ROA. The most dominant variable in this research is OEOI with value -13,352. The predictive ability of these variables on ROA in this study was 89,1%, while the remaining 10,9% is influenced by other variables not included in this study.

The purpose of this study wa to analyze the effect of the variable the influence of leadership and motivation on employee performance througt work discipline as an intervening variables at Elizabeth Situbondo Hospital. By using the Structural equation model of Partial Least Square (PLS).             The results of the direct influence hypothesis test using the Smart PLS 3.0 aplication. Leadership has a significant positive effect on Work Discipline, Motivation has a significant positive effect on Work Discipline, Leadership has a significant positive effect on employee performance, Motivation has a positive but not significant effect on employee performance, Work Discipline hal a positive but not significant effect on Employee Performance, Leadership has a positif but nor signifikan effect on Employee Performance througt Work Discipline and Motivation has a significant positive but not signficant effect on Employee performance througt Work Discipline.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of the variable influence of work discipline and work environment on the performance of ASN through work motivation as an intervening variable at the Situbondo Police Office. By using the structural equation model of Partial Least Square (PLS).           The result of the direct influence hypothesis test using the Smart PLS 3.0 application Work discipline has a positive but not significant effect on work motivation (H1 is rejected), the work environment has a significant positive effect on work motivation (H2 is accepted), Work discipline has a significant positive effect on ASN performance (H3 is accepted), The Work environment has a positive but not significant effect on ASN Performance (H4 rejected), Work discipline has a positive significant effect on ASN Performance (H5 accepted), Work discipline has a positive but not significant effect on ASN Performance through work motivation (H6 rejected), and the work environment has a significant positiveefeect on the performance of ASN through work motivation (H7 is accepted).