Non-histaminergic TRPA1 neural pathway is required for the development of allergic ocular itch. Pharmacological inhibition of TRPA1 channel can lead to novel therapeutic strategies to treat ocular itch in severe allergic conjunctivitis.

IntroductionAcquired coagulation disorders are a common cause of neonatal bleeding. The thromboelastograph (TEG) comprehensively assesses haemostatic processes in the body. Unfortunately, the reference range of TEG parameters in the neonatal period has not yet been evaluated, which limits the use of the TEG in neonates. In this study, we aimed to establish the reference range of TEG parameters for the neonatal period.MethodsThis study included 371 full‐term infants (≥37 weeks of gestation), and we divided these infants into three groups according to age as follows: 1, 2‐7 and 8‐28 days. We measured their peripheral blood using TEG, coagulation routine and platelet count tests. We analysed differences among the groups.ResultsThe reference ranges for TEG parameters are presented as medians and reference ranges (2.5th and 97.5th percentiles) as follows: R (clot reaction time, seconds) 4.80 (2.80‐7.17), Angle (fibrin production rate) 69.90 (44.91‐78.89), K (clot kinetics, min) 1.40 (0.80‐4.50), MA (maximum amplitude, mm) 63.50(44.34‐74.66) and LY30 (lysis at 30 minutes, %) 0.10 (0.10‐6.95). There were significant differences in Angle, K, MA and LY30 values between the different neonatal day age groups.ConclusionThis study preliminarily establishes a reference range for TEG parameters during the neonatal period. The age of a newborn had a large influence on TEG parameters. Additionally, we demonstrated a correlation between laboratory tests and TEG parameters for this age period. The reference values provided herein are meaningful for future studies.

Background Stage IV gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a type of malignant gastric cancer (GC) with poorer survival compared to metastatic non‐SRCC gastric cancer (NOS). However, chemotherapy alone was unable to maintain long‐term survival. This study aimed to evaluate survival benefit of palliative gastrectomy plus chemotherapy (PG+C) for metastatic gastric SRCC. Methods We obtained data on gastric cancer patients between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Statistical methods included χ2 tests, Kaplan‐Meier curves, COX models, propensity score matching (PSM) and subgroup analysis. Results Among 27 240 gastric cancer patients included, 4638 (17.03%) were SRCC patients. The proportion of patients with younger age, female gender, poorly differentiated grade and M1 stage was higher in SRCC than in NOS (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that multiple metastatic sites (HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.14‐1.69, P = .001) was associated with increased mortality risk in metastatic SRCC. Median survival time was improved in metastatic SRCC receiving PG+C compared to PG/C alone (13 vs 7 months, P < .001). Notably, in subgroup analysis, 13 of 17 groups of metastatic SRCC patients with PG+C had prolonged overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone, especially for those with only one metastatic site (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51‐0.73, P < .001). Conclusions Our results suggested that there exists at least a selective group of stage IV gastric SRCC patients, who could benefit from palliative gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone. Further prospective trials are needed to support our conclusion.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri butio n-NonCo mmerc ial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.