Value of computed tomography (CT) scan and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer was investigated. Seventy-eight patients with esophageal cancer treated in Jinan Central Hospital (Jinan, China) from January 2013 to June 2014 were selected. All patients underwent CT scan and DWI examination, and their clinical history data were analyzed. DWI was conducted. The short-term curative effect and the 3-year survival rate of patients in the high apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value group and the low ADC value group were compared; ADC values in the complete remission (CR) group and the partial remission (PR) group were compared. The difference in value between the length of esophageal lesions and the length of pathological specimens measured by CT scan was significantly different from that detected via DWI examination with b=600, 800 and 1,000 sec/mm2, respectively (P<0.05). The diagnostic rate of esophageal cancer via CT scan was significantly lower than that via DWI examination (P<0.05). After radiotherapy, the clinical control rate in the high ADC value group was significantly higher than that in the low ADC value group, and the 3-year survival rate in the former was significantly higher than that in the latter (P<0.05). In the 2nd week during radiotherapy and at the end of radiotherapy, the ADC values in the CR group were significantly higher than those in the PR group (P<0.05). In the 2nd week during radiotherapy and at the end of radiotherapy, ADC values were used to predict the CR rate of radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 0.776 and 0.935, respectively. Compared with CT scan, DWI has higher diagnostic rate and higher sensitivity. The length of esophageal tumor measured by DWI is close to that of pathological entity, which can guide the delineation of the target area of esophageal cancer.
Objective At present, multi-detector cardiac CT has been widely applied in the detection of heart valve morphology and function. This study aims to compare the coronary CT angiography and trans-thoracic echocardiography for patients with mitral valve prolapse. Methods CT angiography and trans-thoracic echocardiography were adopted to detect the movement range and thickness of valvula bicuspidalis. The ultrasonic parameters of CT angiography were considered as standard reference value. Results Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the area of mitral valve motion amplitude under ROC curve was 95% detected by CT angiography with statistical significance ( P < 0.001). Based on the intercept point on the ROC curve, the sensitivity and accuracy of mitral valve amplitude detected by CT angiography was 69.2 and 95.6%, the false positive and false negative rate was 5.2 and 32.4%, the predicted value of positive and negative was 92.9 and 76.9% and the consistency rate of motion range and leaf thickness detected by CT angiography was 83.3 and 47.5%. Trans-thoracic echocardiography showed that the thickness and motion range of mitral leaflet was (1.95 ± 0.22) mm and (1.5 ± 2.28) mm. The thickness and motion range of mitral leaflet that detected by CT was (2.00 ± 0.54) mm and (3.76 ± 2.1) mm. Conclusion The accuracy and reliability of CT angiography for patients with mitral valve prolapse are higher than those of trans-thoracic echocardiography.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.