Riverbed micro-topographical features, such as crest and trough, flat bed, and scour pit, indicate the evolution of fluvial geomorphology, and have an influence on the stability of underwater structures and overall scour pits. Previous studies on bedform feature extraction have focused mainly on the rhythmic bed surface morphology and have extracted crest and trough, while flat bed and scour pit have been ignored. In this study, to extend the feature description of riverbeds, geomorphic elements mapping was used by employing three geomorphic element classification methods: Wood’s criteria, a self-organization map (SOM) technique, and geomorphons. The results showed that geomorphic element mapping can be controlled by adjusting the slope tolerance and curvature tolerance of Wood’s criteria, using the map unit number and combination of the SOM technique and the flatness of geomorphons. Relatively flat bed can be presented using “plane”, “flat planar”, and “flat” elements, while scour pit can be presented using a “pit” element. A comparison of the difference between parameter settings for landforms and bedforms showed that SOM using 8 or 10 map units is applicable for land and underwater surface and is thus preferentially recommended for use. Furthermore, the use of geomorphons is recommended as the optimal method for characterizing bedform features because it provides a simple element map in the absence of area loss.
The lateral bathymetry in the estuary results in different degrees of tidal mixing asymmetry, which has significant impacts on the longitudinal sediment transport by changing the temporal variation of vertical eddy diffusion. This study focus on the lateral variation of tidal mixing asymmetry and longitudinal sediment transport at the landward boundary of turbidity maximum zone in the North Channel of Yangtze estuary, which is a typical time-dependent salt wedge estuary. A transect survey was carried out in December, 2018; five vertical profiles of flow velocity, salinity and suspended sediment concentration were simultaneously measured covering a spring tidal cycle. Analysis of the data revealed that, after the maximum ebb, the stratification in the main and secondary channel was stronger than that on the shoal. In the channel, during ebb tide, the stronger stratification restrained the turbulent mixing induced by vertical shear, vertical mixing during the flood tide was stronger than that during ebb tide and vertical mixing coefficients ranged from 0.06 to 0.12, showing regular tidal mixing asymmetry over a flood–ebb tidal cycle. Therefore, stronger eddy diffusion caused by vertical mixing resulted in higher suspended sediment concentrations during flood tide, the larger landward tidally averaged sediment transport rate was induced by tidal pumping with the transportation of flood tidal current and the net sediment transport over a flood–ebb tidal cycle in the channel was landward. Meanwhile, on the shoal, under the effect of vertical shear, the vertical mixing during flood tide was weaker than that during ebb tide; vertical mixing coefficients ranged from −0.27 to −0.02, showing the reversed tidal mixing asymmetry. Higher suspended sediment concentration was transported seaward by the ebb current, the tidally averaged sediment transport rate by both tidal pumping and advection was seaward and the net sediment transport was seaward. Furthermore, large river discharge increased the seaward advection sediment flux on the surface layer in the main channel, resulting in the seaward tidally averaged sediment flux. Strong resuspension increased the seaward advection sediment flux near the bottom in the main and secondary channel, resulting in the seaward tidally averaged sediment flux.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.