ObjectiveTo evaluate incidence of minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) failure, identify risk factors and assess the impact of MIST failure on neonatal outcome.DesignRetrospective cohort study. MIST failure was defined as need for early mechanical ventilation (<72 hours of life). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for MIST failure and compare outcomes between groups.SettingTwo tertiary neonatal intensive care centres in the Netherlands.PatientsInfants born between 24 weeks’ and 31 weeks’ gestational age (GA) (n=185) with MIST for respiratory distress syndrome.InterventionsMIST procedure with poractant alfa (100–200 mg/kg).Main outcome measuresContinuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) failure after MIST in the first 72 hours of life.Results30% of the infants failed CPAP after MIST. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, four risk factors were independently associated with failure: GA <28 weeks, C reactive protein ≥10 mg/L, absence of antenatal corticosteroids and lower surfactant dose. Infants receiving 200 mg/kg surfactant had a failure rate of 14% versus 35% with surfactant dose <200 mg/kg. Mean body temperature was 0.4°C lower at neonatal intensive care unit admission and before the procedure in infants with MIST failure.Furthermore, MIST failure was independently associated with an increased risk of severe intraventricular haemorrhage.ConclusionWe observed moderate MIST failure rates in concordance with the results of earlier studies. Absence of corticosteroids and lower surfactant dose are risk factors for MIST failure that may be modifiable in order to improve MIST success and patient outcome.

Background In preterm infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) has been established to reduce the need of mechanical ventilation and might improve survival rates without bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The aim of this study was to investigate whether NICU care has changed after introduction of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA), with regard to diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the first week of life. Methods Infants with gestational age < 32 weeks who received surfactant by LISA (June 2014 – December 2017, n = 169) were retrospectively compared to infants who received surfactant after intubation (January 2012 – May 2014, n = 155). Local protocols on indication for surfactant, early onset sepsis, blood transfusions and enteral feeding did not change between both study periods. Besides, as secondary outcome complications of prematurity were compared. Data was collected from electronic patient files and compared by univariate analysis through Students T-test, Mann Whitney-U test, Pearson Chi-Square test or Linear by Linear Association. Results All baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. Compared to controls, LISA patients received a higher total surfactant dose (208 vs.160 mg/kg; p < 0.001), required redosing more frequently (32.5% vs. 21.3%; p = 0.023), but needed less mechanical ventilation (35.5% vs. 76.8%; p < 0.001). After LISA, infants underwent fewer X-rays (1.0 vs. 3.0, p < 0.001), blood gas examinations (3.0 vs. 5.0, p < 0.001), less inotropic drugs (9.5% vs. 18.1%; p = 0.024), blood transfusions (24.9% vs. 41.9%, p = 0.003) and had shorter duration of antibiotic therapy for suspected early onset sepsis (3.0 vs. 5.0 days, p < 0.001). Moreover, enteral feeding was advanced faster (120 vs. 100 mL/kg/d, p = 0.048) at day seven. There were no differences in complications of prematurity. Conclusion The introduction of LISA is associated with significantly fewer diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the first week of life, which emphasizes the beneficial effects of LISA.

No abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) to preterm infants is associated with decreased risk for death or BPD. After LISA, a considerable proportion requires a second dose of surfactant because of ongoing respiratory distress syndrome, raising a clinical dilemma between intubation or performing a repeated LISA (re-LISA) procedure. We aim to assess efficacy of re-LISA in avoiding subsequent nasal continuous positive airway pressure failure (need for intubation in the first 72 h of life; CPAP-F), to identify factors associated with subsequent CPAP-F, and to compare short-term outcomes following re-LISA to surfactant retreatment by endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was an observational retrospective study in two Dutch NICUs. Inclusion criterion was infants with gestational age &#x3c;32 0/7 weeks requiring a second surfactant dose. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 209 infants requiring second surfactant dose, 132 received re-LISA. Subsequent CPAP-F was observed in 56 (42%) infants and was associated with extreme prematurity (OR 2.6, 95% CI: 1.2–5.8) and FiO₂&#x3e;0.5 (OR 5.4, 95% CI: 2.0–14.7). Infants receiving re-LISA had a lower risk of death or BPD compared to infants intubated for the second surfactant dose (OR 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2–0.9). Infants with CPAP-F after re-LISA had similar outcomes compared to those intubated for second surfactant dose. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Re-LISA is effective in reducing CPAP-F and is associated with lower risk of death or BPD compared to retreatment via an endotracheal tube. Infants failing CPAP after re-LISA have similar outcomes compared to intubated infants. These findings support the use of re-LISA in preterm infants with ongoing RDS.