The use of staging imaging in melanoma patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) has been reported to be of limited value. Improved accuracy resulting from the development of time-of-flight positron emission tomography (PET) and ongoing image quality improvement of computed tomography (CT) may challenge this statement. Our retrospective study assessed the clinical value of routine staging CT and PET/CT imaging in a recent cohort of asymptomatic SLN-positive patients. Between January 2011 and April 2014, 143 patients with a positive SLN were routinely staged using CT of various parts of the body or whole-body PET/CT. Scores were assigned for level of certainty for regional or distant metastases and incidental second primary malignancies. Diagnostic test performance was assessed, as well as the number and nature of ensuing additional diagnostic actions. CT was performed in 102 of 143 (71%) patients and PET/CT in 41 (29%) patients. The use of PET/CT increased over the study period. Metastases were found in two of the 143 patients (true-positive yield 1.4%). Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value were 11, 73 and 4% for CT and 17, 57 and 6%, respectively, for PET/CT. None of the 143 patients had a change in AJCC stage. Two other primary malignancies were found. Twenty-one (15%) patients were subjected to 37 additional investigations, referrals or procedures. Routine staging imaging with CT or PET/CT in SLN-positive patients is not useful. The yield is low and the results are often false positive, leading to unnecessary additional tests, most of which are costly and some potentially morbid.

Whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly used to stage patients with palpable lymph node metastases from melanoma, but their role in patients with satellite and/or in-transit metastasis (S&ITM) is unclear. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic value of PET/CT and brain MRI in these patients, and to assess their influence on subsequent management decisions. In this prospective study, 25 melanoma patients with a first presentation of S&ITM who had no clinical evidence of palpable nodal or distant metastasis underwent whole-body 18 F-FDG PET/CT and brain MRI after a tentative pre-scan treatment plan had been made. Sensitivity and specificity of imaging were determined by pathological confirmation, clinical outcome and repeat PET/CT and MRI at 6 months. PET/CT led to a modification of the initial treatment plan in four patients (16%). All four were upstaged (AJCC stage eighth edition). PET/CT was false-positive in one patient, who had a Schwannoma in his trapezius muscle. A thyroid carcinoma was an incidental finding in another patient. The sensitivity of PET/CT was 58% and specificity 83%. In 6 months following the baseline PET/CT, further sites of in-transit or systemic disease were identified in 10 patients (40%). Brain MRI did not alter the treatment plan or change the disease stage in any patient. Whole-body PET/CT improved staging in melanoma patients with S&ITM and changed the originally-contemplated treatment plan in 16%. MRI of the brain appeared not to be useful.

Although the risk of additional nodal involvement is low, detailed pathologic examination may identify NSLN metastases not identified using routine protocols. Therefore, nodal clearance appears to be the safest option for these patients, pending the results of prospective trials.