The impact of vasopressor and sedative drugs on cerebrovascular reactivity in traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of changes of doses of commonly administered sedation (i.e., propofol, fentanyl, and ketamine) and vasopressor agents (i.e., norepinephrine [NE], phenylephrine [PE], and vasopressin[VSP]) on cerebrovascular reactivity and compensatory reserve in patients with moderate/severe TBI. Using the Winnipeg Acute TBI Database, we identified 38 patients with more than 1000 distinct changes of infusion rates and more than 500 h of paired drug infusion/physiology data. Cerebrovascular reactivity was assessed using pressure reactivity index (PRx) and cerebral compensatory reserve was assessed using RAP (the correlation [R] between pulse amplitude of intracranial pressure [ICP; A] and ICP [P]). We evaluated the data in two phases. First, we assessed the relationship between mean hourly dose of medication and its relation to both mean hourly index values, and time spent above a given index threshold. Second, we evaluated time-series data for each individual dose change per medication, assessing for a statistically significant change in PRx and RAP metrics. The results of the analysis confirmed that, overall, the mean hourly dose of sedative (propofol, fentanyl, and ketamine) and vasopressor (NE, PE, and VSP) agents does not impact hourly cerebrovascular reactivity or compensatory reserve measures. Similarly, incremental dose changes in these medications in general do not lead to significant changes in cerebrovascular reactivity or compensatory reserve. For propofol with incremental dose increases, in situations where PRx is intact (i.e., PRx <0 prior), a statistically significant increase in PRx was seen. However, this may not indicate deteriorating cerebrovascular reactivity as the final PRx (∼0.05) may still be considered to be intact cerebrovascular reactivity. As such, this finding with regards to propofol remains “weak.” This study indicates that commonly administered sedative and vasopressor agents with incremental dosing changes have no clinically significant influence on cerebrovascular reactivity or compensatory reserve in TBI. These results should be considered preliminary, requiring further investigation.

Intravenous propofol, fentanyl, and midazolam are utilized commonly in critical care for metabolic suppression and anesthesia. The impact of propofol, fentanyl, and midazolam on cerebrovasculature and cerebral blood flow (CBF) is unclear in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and may carry important implications, as care is shifting to focus on cerebrovascular reactivity monitoring/directed therapies. The aim of this study was to perform a scoping review of the literature on the cerebrovascular/CBF effects of propofol, fentanyl, and midazolam in human patients with moderate/severe TBI and animal models with TBI. A search of MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library from inception to May 2020 was performed. All articles were included pertaining to the administration of propofol, fentanyl, and midazolam, in which the impact on CBF/cerebral vasculature was recorded. We identified 14 studies: 8 that evaluated propofol, 5 that evaluated fentanyl, and 2 that evaluated midazolam. All studies suffered from significant limitations, including: small sample size, and heterogeneous design and measurement techniques. In general, there was no significant change seen in CBF/cerebrovascular response to administration of propofol, fentanyl, or midazolam during experiments where PCO 2 and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were controlled. This review highlights the current knowledge gap surrounding the impact of commonly utilized sedative drugs in TBI care. This work supports the need for dedicated studies, both experimental and human-based, evaluating the impact of these drugs on CBF and cerebrovascular reactivity/response in TBI.

No abstract

Background Intravenous hypertonic saline is utilized commonly in critical care for treatment of acute or refractory elevations of intracranial pressure (ICP) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Though there is a clear understanding of the general physiological effects of a hypertonic saline solution over long periods of time, smaller epoch effects of hypertonic saline (HTS) have not been thoroughly analyzed. The aim of this study was to perform a direct evaluation of the high-frequency response of HTS on the cerebrovascular physiological responses in TBI. Methods We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained adult TBI database for those with archived high-frequency cerebral physiology and available HTS treatment information. We evaluated different epochs of physiology around HTS bolus dosing, comparing pre-with post-HTS. We assessed for changes in slow fluctuations in ICP, pulse amplitude of ICP (AMP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cerebrovascular reactivity (as measured through pressure reactivity index (PRx)), and cerebral compensatory reserve (correlation (R) between AMP (A) and ICP (P)). Comparisons of mean measures and percentage time above clinically relevant thresholds for the physiological parameters were compared pre-and post-HTS using descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney U testing. We assessed for subgroups of physiological responses using latent profile analysis (LPA). Results Fifteen patients underwent 69 distinct bolus infusions of hypertonic saline. Apart from the well-documented decrease in ICP, there was also a reduction in AMP. The analysis of cerebrovascular reactivity response to HTS solution had two main effects. For patients with grossly impaired cerebrovascular reactivity pre-HTS (PRx > + 0.30), HTS bolus led to improved reactivity. However, for those with intact cerebrovascular reactivity pre-HTS (PRx < 0), HTS bolus demonstrated a trend towards more impaired reactivity. This indicates that HTS has different impacts, dependent on pre-bolus cerebrovascular status. There was no significant change in metrics of cerebral compensatory reserve. LPA failed to demonstrate any subgroups of physiological responses to HTS administration. Conclusions The direct decrease in ICP and AMP confirms that a bolus dose of a HTS solution is an effective therapeutic agent for intracranial hypertension. However, in patients with intact autoregulation, hypertonic saline may impair cerebral hemodynamics. These findings regarding cerebrovascular reactivity remain preliminary and require further investigation. This article is part of the Topical Collection on Brain trauma Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (

No abstract