We experimentally determine ensemble-averaged responses of granular packings to point forces, and we compare these results to recent models for force propagation in a granular material. We used 2D granular arrays consisting of photoelastic particles: either disks or pentagons, thus spanning the range from ordered to disordered packings. A key finding is that spatial ordering of the particles is a key factor in the force response. Ordered packings have a propagative component that does not occur in disordered packings.PACS numbers: 46.10.+z, 47.20.-k Granular systems have captured much recent interest due to their rich phenomenology, and important applications [1]. Even in the absence of strong spatial disorder of the grains, static arrays show inhomogeneous spatial stress profiles called stress (or force) chains [2]. Forces are carried primarily by a tenuous network that is a fraction of the total number of grains.A fundamental unresolved issue concerns how granular materials respond to applied forces, and there are several substantially different models. A broad group of conventional continuum models (e.g. elasto-plastic, . . .) posit an elastic response for material up to the point of plastic deformation [3]. The stresses in portions of such a system below plastic yield have an elastic response and satisfy an elliptic partial differential equation (PDE); those parts that are plastically deforming satisfy a hyperbolic PDE. Several fundamentally different models have recently been proposed. The q-model of Coppersmith et al.[4] assumes a regular lattice of grains, and randomness is introduced at the contacts. This model successfully predicts the distribution of forces in the large force limit, as verified by several static and quasistatic experiments and models [4][5][6]. In the continuum limit, this model reduces to the diffusion equation, since the forces effectively propagate by a random walk. Another model (the Oriented Stress Linearity-OSL-model) of Bouchaud et al. [7], has a constitutive law, justified through a microscopic model, of the form σ zz = µσ xz + ησ xx (in 2D) in order to close the stress balance conditions ∂σ ij /∂x j = ρg i . This leads to wave-like hyperbolic PDEs describing the spatial variation of stresses. In later work, these authors considered weak randomness in the lattice The range of predictions among the models is perhaps best appreciated by noting that the different pictures predict qualitatively different PDEs for the variation of stresses within a sample: e.g. for elasto-plastic models an elliptic or hyperbolic PDE; for the q-model, a parabolic PDE; and for the OSL model without randomness, a hyperbolic PDE. The impact of equation type extends to the boundary conditions needed to determine a solution: e.g. hyperbolic equations require less boundary information than an elliptic equation.Here, we explore these issues through experiments on a 2D granular system consisting of photoelastic (i.e birefringent under strain) polymer particles [6] that are either disks or pentagons. By vi...
We report experiments on piles of cohesionless granular materials showing the effect of construction history on static stress distributions. Stresses under piles are monitored by sensitive capacitive techniques. The piles are formed either by pouring granular material from a funnel with a small outlet (localized source), or from a large sieve (homogeneous rain). Localized sources yield stress profiles with a clear stress dip near the center of the pile; the homogeneous rain profiles have no stress dip. We show that the stress profiles scale linearly with the pile height. Experiments on wedge-shaped piles show similar but weaker effects.
The modelling of the adherence energy during peeling of Pressure Sensitive Adhesives (PSA) has received much attention since the 1950's, uncovering several factors that aim at explaining their high adherence on most substrates, such as the softness and strong viscoelastic behaviour of the adhesive, the low thickness of the adhesive layer and its confinement by a rigid backing. The more recent investigation of adhesives by probe-tack methods also revealed the importance of cavitation and stringing mechanisms during debonding, underlining the influence of large deformations and of the related non-linear response of the material, which also intervenes during peeling. Although a global modelling of the complex coupling of all these ingredients remains a formidable issue, we report here some key experiments and modelling arguments that should constitute an important step forward. We first measure a non-trivial dependence of the adherence energy on the loading geometry, namely through the influence of the peeling angle, which is found to be separable from the peeling velocity dependence. This is the first time to our knowledge that such adherence energy dependence on the peeling angle is systematically investigated and unambiguously demonstrated. Secondly, we reveal an independent strong influence of the large strain rheology of the adhesives on the adherence energy. We complete both measurements with a microscopic investigation of the debonding region. We discuss existing modellings in light of these measurements and of recent soft material mechanics arguments, to show that the adherence energy during peeling of PSA should not be associated to the propagation of an interfacial stress singularity. The relevant deformation mechanisms are actually located over the whole adhesive thickness, and the adherence energy during peeling of PSA should rather be associated to the energy loss by viscous friction and by rate-dependent elastic hysteresis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.