BackgroundRye (Secale cereale L.) is, second to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), the most common cereal used for producing bread. Rye‐based breads are of great interest because of their high dietary fiber and lysine contents and because of their health effects. However, the bread‐making performance of rye flour is inferior to that of wheat flour.FindingsThis review summarizes the current knowledge about the major rye constituents (starch, proteins, and arabinoxylans), their role during bread making, and the potential health implications of rye bread consumption. Rye proteins play only a minor role during bread making, but their exact role remains insufficiently explored. In contrast to wheat proteins, they lack the ability to form a network with good gas‐retaining properties. The rye bread crumb structure is partly attributed to its starch and arabinoxylan polysaccharides. Both bind a lot of water, form networks, and bring about the rye bread structure.ConclusionsNevertheless, a better understanding of the role of rye starch, proteins, and arabinoxylans, their interactions, and their impact on dough structure or product quality still needs further exploration. In terms of health effects, EFSA has acknowledged that rye fiber contributes to normal bowel function. There are also indications that rye bread consumption has a number of positive effects such as reducing the risk of colon cancer and hunger feelings and cholesterol‐lowering effects. However, although beneficial health effects of rye‐bread consumption are shown, more research is needed.Significance and noveltyA literature search with the terms “rye” and “review” in Web of Science in April 2020 resulted in only six manuscripts. Therefore, this review summarizes the current knowledge about the major rye constituents (starch, proteins, and arabinoxylans), their role during bread making, and the potential health implications of rye bread consumption.

No abstract

Thiol (SH) containing additives improve the mechanical properties of rigid, glassy gluten materials. However, the underlying molecular mechanism is still unclear. In particular, the importance of the preceding gluten‐additive mixing conditions remains to be investigated. Here, different additives containing either only SH, only disulfide or both SH and disulfide functionalities were synthesized and their impact on the gluten network using different mixing conditions prior to subsequent molding were assessed. All SH containing additives decreased the gluten molecular weight (MW) during mixing to a degree depending on the conditions. Additives with only disulfide functionality did not significantly affect protein size during mixing irrespective of the conditions used. Only when mixing induced sufficient MW reduction did the strength and failure strain of rigid gluten materials increase. This shows that factors other than the degree of cross‐linking affect the strength of rigid gluten materials. These results support our hypothesis that altered molecular conformations and improved molecular entanglements contribute to material strength. The extent to which such conformational changes occur may depend on the additive and the way of mixing. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 41160.