Objective Using highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques, we reanalysed all cervical carcinomas (CCs) found to be human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative by Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) to determine the prevalence of true HPV-negativity. We also evaluated the characteristics of the patients with tumours with confirmed HPV-negativity.Design Observational study.Setting Barcelona, Spain.Population A cohort of 136 women with CC (32 adenocarcinomas, 104 squamous cell carcinomas) who had pre-treatment HC2 testing.Methods All negative cases were reanalysed and genotyped for HPV using three PCR assays (SPF10, GP5+/6+ and E7-specific assay).Main outcome measures Percentage of confirmed HPV-negative and HPV-positive tumours. Clinicopathological features and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of both groups.Results Fourteen of 136 women (10.2%) were negative for HPV by HC2. After reanalysis by PCR-based techniques only 8/136 (5.8%) tumours were confirmed as HPV-negative, whereas in six cases different HPVs were identified [HPV-11, À16 (two tumours), À18, À45, and À68]. Confirmed HPV-negativity was more frequent in adenocarcinomas than in squamous cell carcinomas (5/32, 15.6% versus 3/104, 2.9%, respectively; P = 0.017). Patients with CCs with confirmed HPV-negativity had significantly worse DFS than women with HPV-positive tumours [51.9 months (95% CI 12.2-91.7 months) versus 109.9 months (95% CI 98.2-121.5 months); P = 0.010]. In the multivariate analysis HPV-negativity and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging were associated with increased risk of progression and mortality.Conclusions An HC2-negative result is an uncommon finding in women with CC, but in almost half of these cases HPVs are identified by more sensitive techniques. CCs with confirmed HPV-negativity are more frequently adenocarcinomas, and seem to be associated with worse DFS.

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are the causative agents of virtually all cervical carcinomas. Nevertheless, a small proportion of cervical cancer are negative for HPV, although the significance of this finding remains unclear. We aimed to provide insight into the differential clinico-pathological characteristics of this unusual subset of HPV-negative cervical cancer. We performed HPV-DNA detection using a highly sensitive PCR test (SPF10) and p16 immunostaining in 214 cervical carcinomas specimens from women treated at the Gynecological Oncology Unit of the Hospital Clinic (Barcelona, Spain) from 2012 to 2015. The clinical and pathological characteristics,

It has been reported that high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is a causative agent of a subgroup of oropharyngeal carcinomas. In these tumors, the presence of the transcriptionally active HPV has been proved through the identification of HPV E6 or E7 messenger RNA (mRNA) transcripts. The aim of the study was to assess the HPV-active transcription in a series of sinonasal carcinomas, in correlation with the HPV DNA identification and the p16 immunohistochemistry. Seventy patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the sinonasal tract were included in the survey. The main clinicopathological characteristics were recorded. All tumors were investigated for HPV through the HPV DNA detection by PCR, using the SPF10 primers and by in situ hybridization, using the high-risk GenPoint probe (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). HPV16 E7 mRNA transcripts detection was performed by RT-PCR in 27 cases. The immunostaining for p16 was performed in all cases. Fourteen carcinomas (20%) were positive for high-risk HPV by PCR: 13 HPV16 and one HPV35. In situ hybridization showed a dotted nuclear positivity in all these cases. HPV16 E7 mRNA was detected in seven tumors harboring HPV16; in the remaining HPV-positive cases, RNA did not reach the quality for analysis. Strong, diffuse positivity for p16 was observed only in the HPV-positive cases. The 14 HPV-positive squamous cell carcinomas were non-keratinizing or scarcely keratinizing tumors. No significant differences were found in terms of gender, age, or staging at diagnosis between HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumors. However, differences in disease-free survival and overall survival between both groups of patients were significant (P=0.004 and P=0.028, respectively). In conclusion, we have shown that HPV is the etiological agent of a subset of sinonasal carcinomas demonstrating the transcriptionally active HPV in these tumors. Immunostaining for p16 can be used as a surrogate marker to identify these tumors.