There is a growing concern about the use of manipulative mechanisms in online interfaces and the underlying harm to users' autonomy under the label of 'dark patterns'. The effect of these mechanisms, especially in vulnerable populations, is still under-researched. The present doctoral dissertation aims to understand the conditions under which users are less likely to resist manipulation, following the idea of digital inequalities in manipulative designs. This dissertation expects to contribute in two ways. First, bringing empirical insights about the effectiveness of manipulative mechanisms, especially in low digital skilled populations, and providing enablers that allow them to resist manipulation. Second, providing with guidelines that support practitioners in designing user interfaces for these populations and policymakers in improving the current regulations on manipulative designs.CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI; • Social and professional topics → User characteristics; Computing literacy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.