Background The aim of the present study was to determine predictors of inappropriate use of diagnostic tests and management of bronchiolitis in a population of hospitalized infants. Methods In an analytical cross-sectional study, we determined independent predictors of the inappropriate use of diagnostic tests and management of bronchiolitis in a population of hospitalized infants. We defined a composite outcome score as the main outcome variable. Results Of the 303 included patients, 216 (71.3%) experienced an inappropriate use of diagnostic tests and treatment of bronchiolitis. After controlling for potential confounders, it was found that atopic dermatitis (OR 5.30; CI 95% 1.14–24.79; p = 0.034), length of hospital stay (OR 1.48; CI 95% 1.08–2.03; p = 0.015), and the number of siblings (OR 1.92; CI 95% 1.13–3.26; p = 0.015) were independent predictors of an inappropriate use of diagnostic tests and treatment of the disease. Conclusions Inappropriate use of diagnostic tests and treatment of bronchiolitis was a highly prevalent outcome in our population of study. Participants with atopic dermatitis, a longer hospital stay, and a greater number of siblings were at increased risk for inappropriate use of diagnostic tests and management of the disease.

Introduction: In 2015 the historic Jones criteria for the diagnosis of Acute Rheumatic Fever (ARF) were revised introducing two different sets of criteria for low-risk and for moderate/high-risk populations (according to ARF incidence). In Italy the exact ARF incidence is unknown but small regional or local reports suggest an incidence of 2-5/100.000 per year, suggesting that our population might be considered at moderate risk for ARF. Objectives: To evaluate the performance of the revised Jones criteria in a retrospective population and to compare it with the performance of the previous version of Jones criteria. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 288 patients with ARF (108 female; median age 8.5 years, IQR 7.1-10.3) diagnosed from 2001 to 2015 in a Pediatric Rheumatology Division by pediatric rheumatologists, discharged with an ICD 9 code consistent with ARF. We retrospectively applied the two sets (for low-risk and for moderate/high-risk) of the 2015 revised Jones criteria and the 1992 version of the Jones criteria. Results: Of 288 patients, 253 (87.8%) met the 1992 version of the Jones criteria, 237 (82.3%) met the revised criteria for low-risk populations and 259 (89.9%) for moderate/high-risk populations. None of these differences was significant. Prevalence of major and minor criteria is shown in Table. With the exception of difference in arthritis, the 1992 version and the 2015 revised version did not show major differences. Of the 288 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ARF 29 did not meet any version of the Jones criteria. Patients in this group presented with isolated chorea or silent carditis without other manifestations. Prevalence of the clinical characteristics and comparison among the 1992 version of Jones criteria and the 2015 revised Jones criteria (low risk and moderate-high risk populations): Values are expressed in Number (percentage). *p value (Fisher Exact test) Conclusion: The revised Jones criteria for low-risk populations are slightly more sensitive than the 1992 version of Jones criteria, while the revised Jones criteria for moderate/high populations are slightly less sensitive than the 1992 version. In this population, the revised criteria did not substantially modify the diagnosis of ARF. Approximately 10% of patients presented with isolated chorea or silent carditis.