A series of terminal lead alkoxides have been synthesized utilizing the bulky beta-diketiminate ligand [{N(2,6-(i)Pr(2)C(6)H(3))C(Me)}(2)CH](-) (BDI). The nucleophilicities of these alkoxides have been examined, and unexpected trends were observed. For instance, (BDI)PbOR reacts with methyl iodide only under forcing conditions yet reacts readily, but reversibly, with carbon dioxide. The degree of reversibility is strongly dependent upon minor changes in the R group. For instance, when R = isopropyl, the reversibility is only observed when the resulting alkyl carbonate is treated with other heterocumulenes; however, when R = tert-butyl, the reversibility is apparent upon any application of reduced pressure to the corresponding alkyl carbonate. The differences in the reversibility of carbon dioxide insertion are attributed to the ground-state energy differences of lead alkoxides. The mechanism of carbon dioxide insertion is discussed.

A series of terminal tin(II) alkoxides have been synthesized utilizing the bulky β-diketiminate ligand [{N(2,6-(i)Pr(2)C(6)H(3))-C(Me)}(2)CH] (BDI). The nucleophilicities of these alkoxides have been examined, and unexpected trends were observed. For instance, (BDI)SnOR only reacts with highly activated aliphatic electrophiles such as methyl triflate, but reacts reversibly with carbon dioxide. Both the rate of reaction and the degree of reversibility is dependent upon minor changes in the alkoxide ligand, with the bulkier tert-butoxide ligand displaying slower reactivity than the corresponding isopropyl ligand, although the latter system is a more exergonic reaction. Density Function Theory (DFT) calculations show that the differences in the reversibility of carbon dioxide insertion can be attributed to the ground-state energy differences of tin alkoxides while the rate of reaction is attributed to relative bond strengths of the Sn-O bonds. The mechanism of carbon dioxide insertion is discussed.

The chemistry of β-diketiminate germanium alkoxide complexes has been examined and shown to be in sharp contrast to its heavier congeners. For instance, (BDI)GeOR (BDI = [{N(2,6-(i)Pr(2)C(6)H(3))C(Me)}(2)CH], R = (i)Pr, (s)Bu, (t)Bu) does not react with carbon dioxide to form a metal carbonate complex. Addition of aliphatic electrophiles, such as methyl iodide or methyl triflate, results in the net oxidative addition to the germanium, giving cationic tetravalent germanium complexes, [(BDI)Ge(Me)OR][X] (X = I, OTf). An examination of the contrasting reactivities of the alkoxide ligand and the germanium loan pair with Lewis acids yielded the unusual germanium(II)-copper(I) adduct, {μ(2)-Cu(2)I(2)}[(BDI)GeO(t)Bu](2). This complex not only displays a rare example of a divalent Ge-Cu bond, but is the first example in which a planar Cu(2)I(2) diamond core possesses a three-coordinate copper bound to another metal center.

The most common β-diketiminate ligand, [{N(2,6- i Pr2C6H3)C(Me)}2CH]− (BDI), was used to synthesize a new mercury complex in which two BDI ligands are bound to the metal through the γ-carbons in the solid state. In solution, one of the BDI ligands switches to an N,N′-binding mode; this complex is in equilibrium with the homoleptic species. The thermodynamic parameters, ΔH° (−2.52 kcal mol−1), ΔS° (−9.24 cal mol−1 K−1), and ΔG°298 (0.23 kcal mol−1), were measured using variable-temperature 1H NMR spectroscopy.