Ecologists have long been intrigued by the ways co-occurring species divide limiting resources. Such resource partitioning, or niche differentiation, may promote species diversity by reducing competition. Although resource partitioning is an important determinant of species diversity and composition in animal communities, its importance in structuring plant communities has been difficult to resolve. This is due mainly to difficulties in studying how plants compete for below-ground resources. Here we provide evidence from a 15N-tracer field experiment showing that plant species in a nitrogen-limited, arctic tundra community were differentiated in timing, depth and chemical form of nitrogen uptake, and that species dominance was strongly correlated with uptake of the most available soil nitrogen forms. That is, the most productive species used the most abundant nitrogen forms, and less productive species used less abundant forms. To our knowledge, this is the first documentation that the composition of a plant community is related to partitioning of differentially available forms of a single limiting resource.
Plant species collected from tundra ecosystems located along a north-south transect from central Alaska to the north coast of Alaska showed large and consistent differences in N natural abundances. Foliar δN values varied by about 10% among species within each of two moist tussock tundra sites. Differences in N contents among species or plant groups were consistent across moist tussock tundra at several other sites and across five other tundra types at a single site. Ericaceous species had the lowest δN values, ranging between about -8 to -6‰. Foliar N contents increased progressively in birch, willows and sedges to maximum δN values of about +2‰ in sedges. Soil N contents in tundra ecosystems at our two most intensively studied sites increased with depth and δN values were usually higher for soils than for plants. Isotopic fractionations during soil N transformations and possibly during plant N uptake could lead to observed differences in N contents among plant species and between plants and soils. Patterns of variation inN content among species indicate that tundra plants acquire nitrogen in extremely nutrient-poor environments by competitive partitioning of the overall N pool. Differences in plant N sources, rooting depth, mycorrhizal associations, forms of N taken up, and other factors controlling plant N uptake are possible causes of variations in δN values of tundra plant species.
Uncertainties regarding the relationships between leaf and root traits have impeded an integrated understanding of plant evolution and the efficient parameterization of ecosystem models. We measured key root and leaf traits of grasses from 77 sites in four grassland regions of the world (New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, North America). Within each region, the relationships among leaf traits paralleled those among root traits. Plants with low root or leaf N concentrations had roots or leaves with high tissue density, high lignin concentrations, low amount of mass that was soluble in a neutral detergent solution, large diameter/thickness, and were less enriched in 15N. Yet, whether comparing plants within a region or among all four regions, there was little relationship between root traits and leaf traits, except for a positive relationship between root and leaf N concentration and between root and leaf δ15N. At the global scale, factors such as soil freezing and the type of nutrient limitation appear to determine relationships among leaves and roots. C4 grasses not only had lower leaf N concentrations than C3 grasses but also lower root N concentrations. When compared at the same root N concentration, C4 grasses had greater leaf N concentrations than C3 grasses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.