No abstract

Highlights Shelter-in-place mandate for COVID-19 led to an increase in pediatric burn admissions. School-age children burn admissions increased 28% for our burn center. Prevention strategies must target at-risk children if there is another shelter-in-place mandate.

Abstract The features of work-related burn (WRB) injuries are not well defined in the literature and they vary depending on geographical location. We wanted to describe these characteristics among patients treated in the UNC Burn Center to evaluate the potential impact of commonly accepted prevention efforts. Adults of working age, admitted between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2018, were identified using our Burn Center Registry. Demographic data, characteristics of injury, course of treatment, and patients’ outcomes were described. Differences between work-related and non-work-related injuries were evaluated using the Chi-square test and Student t-test where appropriate. Three thousand five hundred and forty-five patients were included. WRB cases constituted 18% of the study population, and this proportion remained relatively stable during the study timeframe. Young white males were the majority of this group. When compared with non-WRB patients, they were characterized by fewer co-morbidities, decreased TBSA burns, decreased risk of inhalation injury, shorter time of intensive care treatment, shorter lengths of hospital stay, and lower treatment cost. In contrast to non-WRB, among which flame injuries were the main reason for admission, work-related patients most often suffered scald burns. They also had a dramatically increased proportion of chemical and electrical burns, making the latter the most common cause of death in that group. WRB are characterized by a characteristic patient profile, burn etiologies, and outcomes. Learning specific patterns at this group may contribute to optimize work safety regulations and medical interventions.

No abstract

Supply and demand dictate resource allocation in large academic institutions. Classic teaching is that burns is a seasonal specialty with winter being the “busiest” time of year. Resident allocation during the winter and summer months, however, is traditionally low due to the holidays and travel peaks. Our objective was to evaluate our acuity—defined as patient complexity—based on seasons, in order to petition for appropriate mid-level provider allocation. We performed a retrospective review of all admissions to an accredited, large academic burn center. All patients admitted between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Demographics, length of stay, injury characteristics, and mortality were evaluated. Thirteen thousand four hundred fifty-eight patients were admitted during this study period. Most patients were admitted during the summer. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit were more likely to be admitted in the winter, although this was not statistically significant. Winter admissions had the longest lengths of stay, and the highest incidence of inhalation injury. Female and elderly patients were more likely admitted during the winter. There was a significant difference in mortality between summer and winter seasons. Acuity is seasonal in our large academic burn center and resource allocation should align with the needs of the patients. This data may help large centers petition their institutions for more consistent experienced mid-level providers, specifically during critical seasons.