Purpose of Review Food insecurity (FI) is a serious public health issue affecting 2 billion people worldwide. FI is associated with increased risk for multiple chronic diseases, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and mental health. We selected these four chronic diseases given their global prevalence and comorbid associations with each other. We evaluated the most recent literature published over the past 5 years and offer strategies for the screening of FI. Recent Findings Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses report an association between FI and obesity in adult women as well as adult men and women living in low- and middle-income countries. Gender differences also were observed between FI and type 2 diabetes, such that adult women showed an increased risk for type 2 diabetes. This association was influenced by social determinants of health. Very low food security (i.e., high FI) was associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease and a higher risk for cardiovascular disease mortality. Finally, several studies showed an association between FI and adverse mental health outcomes, including increased risk for stress, depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, and suicidal ideation. Summary FI and its negative association with body weight, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and mental health provide a compelling rationale for identification of FI in clinical settings. Brief, well-validated screening measures are available in multiple languages. Despite the need for FI screening, many guidelines do not address its implementation. For this reason, more research and targeted interventions are needed to increase FI screening rates and close the loop in the coordination of resources.

Background: The Ohio Cardiovascular and Diabetes Health Collaborative (Cardi-OH) unites the 7 medical schools in Ohio to improve cardiovascular (CV) and diabetes health outcomes and eliminate disparities in Ohio’s Medicaid population. The purpose of the Cardi-OH needs assessment was to identify high priority clinical topics for the dissemination of evidenced-based best practices to providers across the state. Methods: The cross-sectional survey was distributed via REDCap (research electronic data capture) to Cardi-OH members and its external contacts (i.e., people who have engaged with Cardi-OH but are not members) in 2022. Question topics were identified by Cardi-OH members based on perceived gaps in existing content. Results: A total of 88% (n=103) of 117 Cardi-OH members and 8% (n=98) of 1,204 external contacts participated. Of those, 51% (n=53) of Cardi-OH members and 47% (n=46) of external contacts provided direct clinical care. The top items for Cardi-OH members (clinical and non-clinical combined) were: 1) lifestyle prescriptions (n=50, 49%), 2) atypical diabetes (n=38, 37%), 3) COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease (CVD) (n=38, 37%), and 3) mental health and CVD (n=38, 37%). For external contacts, the top topics were: 1) lifestyle prescriptions (n=53, 54.1%), 2) mental health and CVD (n=39, 39.8%), 3) alcohol and CVD (n=27, 27.6%), and 3) CV complications (n=27, 27.6%). Regarding social determinants of health (SDOH), Cardi-OH members prioritized: 1) weight bias and stigma (n=44, 43%), 2) family-focused interventions (n=40, 39%), and 3) adverse childhood experiences (ACEs, n=37, 36%). External contacts selected: 1) family-focused interventions (n=51, 52%), 2) implicit bias (n=43, 43.9%), and 3) ACEs (n=39, 39.8%). Conclusions: Shared prioritized topics included lifestyle, SDOH, and behavioral health; these may be useful to other professional organizations as they consider dissemination priorities. Disclosure E.A.Beverly: None. A.Kinsella: None. L.J.Lammert: None. A.Nevar: None. G.Irwin: None. C.Rollins: None. M.W.Konstan: None. S.D.Bolen: None. S.Koopman gonzalez: Research Support; Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation. K.M.Dungan: Board Member; Elsevier, Consultant; Eli Lilly and Company, Dexcom, Inc., Other Relationship; UpToDate, Research Support; Dexcom, Inc., Abbott, ViaCyte, Inc., Sanofi, Speaker's Bureau; Academy for Continued Healthcare Learning, Cardiometabolic Health Congress, Medscape, Integritas. J.T.Wright: Advisory Panel; Medtronic. K.R.Baughman: None. R.Wexler: None. L.D.Dworkin: None. G.D.Solomon: None. J.F.Lamb: None. Funding Ohio Department of Medicaid’s Medicaid Technical Assistance and Policy Program

Background: Cinematic-virtual reality (cine-VR) has demonstrated improvements in cultural self-efficacy, diabetes attitudes, and empathy among healthcare providers, but its impact on health professional students is unknown. The purpose of the single-arm pre-post study was to examine the feasibility of this cine-VR diabetes training program as well as to assess changes in cultural self-efficacy, diabetes attitudes, and empathy among health professional students. Method: Participants viewed 12 cine-VR 12 simulations about a 72-year-old patient with type 2 diabetes. Pre-training and post-training, they completed the Transcultural Self-Efficacy Tool, Diabetes Attitude Scale-3, and Jefferson Scale of Empathy. Results: All 92 participants completed the full training. No participants reported technological difficulties or adverse events. For the assessment, 66 participants completed the pre-post measures for a response rate of 71.7% (mean age = 21.1 ± 1.9 years, 82.6% [n = 57] women; 84.1% [n = 58] white). We observed positive improvements in all three cultural self-efficacy subscales: “Cognitive” ( t value = −4.705, P < .001), “Practical” (mean change = −.99, t value = −4.240, P < .001), and “Affective” ( t value = −2.763, P = .008). Similarly, we observed positive improvements in four of the five diabetes attitude subscales: “Need for special training” ( Z = −4.281, P < .001), “Seriousness of type 2 diabetes” ( Z = −3.951, P < .001), “Value of tight glucose control” ( Z = −1.676, P = .094), “Psychosocial impact of diabetes” ( Z = −5.892, P < .001), and “Attitude toward patient autonomy” ( Z = −2.889, P = .005). Finally, we observed a positive improvement in empathy ( t value = −5.151, P < .001). Conclusions: Findings suggest that the cine-VR diabetes training program has the potential to improve cultural self-efficacy, diabetes attitudes, and empathy among health professional students. A randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm its effectiveness.

No abstract

Background: Diabetes care for older adults is complex and must consider geriatric syndromes, disability, and elder abuse and neglect. Health care providers would benefit from professional training programs that emphasize these risks. One new educational approach is cinematic virtual reality (cine-VR). We conducted a pilot study to evaluate a cine-VR training program based on an older patient with type 2 diabetes and multiple geriatric syndromes who is at risk for elder abuse and neglect. Methods: We employed a single-arm, pre-post-test study to assess changes in attitudes to disability and self-efficacy in identifying and managing elder abuse and neglect. Results: Thirty health care providers completed the pilot study (83.3% women, 86.7% white, 56.7% physicians, 43.4% practiced in outpatient clinics). We observed change in attitudes toward discrimination ( Z = −2.628, P = .009, Cohen’s d = .62). In addition, we observed changes in six of the eight self-efficacy items, including how participants would ask questions about abuse ( Z = −3.221, P = .001, Cohen’s d = .59) and helping an older patient make a report to the police or social services ( Z = −2.087, P = .037, Cohen’s d = .52). In addition, we observed positive changes in understanding the documentation needed to complete whether a patient reports abuse ( Z = −3.598, P < .001) as well as the legal knowledge for how to report elder abuse and neglect ( Z = −2.556, P = .011). Conclusion: Findings from this pilot study suggest that cine-VR training may increase health care providers’ awareness of discrimination and improve self-efficacy toward identifying and managing elder abuse and neglect. Research with a proper control condition is needed to confirm its effectiveness.