Group status hierarchies can affect individuals’ experiences (e.g., sense of belonging) and the group’s outcomes (e.g., cohesion) in group-based outdoor adventure education programs. The study aimed to explore how specific interpersonal status processes, which we also call the “relational status game,” within an expedition group, affect inclusion and exclusion dynamics. Drawing on ethnographic data and a Bourdieusian sociological framework, we explore how members of an educational expedition group used their interpersonal relations and engaged in specific social interactions to maintain or improve their status. Six relational strategies that led to either social exclusion or social inclusion were identified. Relational strategies are interpersonal relations and interactions between group members that depend on one another’s “objective” positions in the group and whose nature (positive or negative) can provide social status benefits for at least one member. Outdoor educators could build on those findings to raise groups’ awareness about this issue in order to foster inclusive group dynamics.
Group status hierarchies can affect individuals’ experiences and groups’ outcomes in group-based Outdoor Adventure Education programs. As status is associated with perceived competence, the aim of this study was to explore the strategies used by group members to influence others’ perceptions of their competences in an educational expedition group. Drawing on ethnographic data, a Bourdieusian sociological framework was used to highlight the rationale underlying the different strategies identified. Our findings indicated that participants’ sense of place in the group status structure influenced the strategies they used to convey an image of proficiency. Configurations of differential characteristics, such as gender, age, experience and social class, played a decisive role in this regard. Men who failed to achieve the status they believed they deserved were more likely to adopt strategies that were detrimental to others. We propose ways practitioners could build on these results to improve inclusivity and equality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.