No abstract

Worldwide fisheries generate large volumes of fishery waste and it is often assumed that this additional food is beneficial to populations of marine top-predators. We challenge this concept via a detailed study of foraging Cape gannets Morus capensis and of their feeding environment in the Benguela upwelling zone. The natural prey of Cape gannets (pelagic fishes) is depleted and birds now feed extensively on fishery wastes. These are beneficial to non-breeding birds, which show reduced feeding effort and high survival. By contrast, breeding gannets double their diving effort in an attempt to provision their chicks predominantly with high-quality, live pelagic fishes. Owing to a scarcity of this resource, they fail and most chicks die. Our study supports the junk-food hypothesis for Cape gannets since it shows that non-breeding birds can survive when complementing their diet with fishery wastes, but that they struggle to reproduce if live prey is scarce. This is due to the negative impact of low-quality fishery wastes on the growth patterns of gannet chicks. Marine management policies should not assume that fishery waste is generally beneficial to scavenging seabirds and that an abundance of this artificial resource will automatically inflate their populations.

No-take zones may protect populations of targeted marine species and restore the integrity of marine ecosystems, but it is unclear whether they benefit top predators that rely on mobile pelagic fishes. In South Africa, foraging effort of breeding African penguins decreased by 30 per cent within three months of closing a 20 km zone to the competing purse-seine fisheries around their largest colony. After the fishing ban, most of the penguins from this island had shifted their feeding effort inside the closed area. Birds breeding at another colony situated 50 km away, whose fishing grounds remained open to fishing, increased their foraging effort during the same period. This demonstrates the immediate benefit of a relatively small no-take zone for a marine top predator relying on pelagic prey. Selecting such small protected areas may be an important first conservation step, minimizing stakeholder conflicts and easing compliance, while ensuring benefit for the ecosystems within these habitats.

We compared the foraging ecology of Cape gannets Morus capensis attending 2 colonies of equivalent size, yet with contrasting diet and population trends. One colony, on the west coast of South Africa, is decreasing in size and its occupants feed mainly on fishery wastes, whereas the other colony, on the south coast of South Africa, is growing and its occupants feed exclusively on natural prey (pelagic fish). In October and November 2005, we examined the diet, at-sea behaviour, and energy requirements of breeding gannets using direct observations, miniaturised GPS loggers, and time-depth recorders attached to foraging adults. Concurrent hydroacoustic surveys allowed us to assess the distribution and abundance of their preferred prey (the sardine Sardinops sagax and anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus). Birds from the declining west coast colony foraged in areas containing very low abundances of pelagic fish. They fed primarily on low-energy fishery discards. They increased their foraging effort and exploited a greater area than birds from the growing colony, which took advantage of abundant pelagic fish stocks in their foraging range. A marked eastward shift of pelagic fish initiated in the late 1990s has resulted in the shortage of natural prey to Cape gannets on the west coast, strongly suggesting that the local population trend is driven by food availability during the breeding season. A bioenergetic model showed that enhanced availability of lowenergy fishery discards does not seem to compensate for the absence of natural prey. Added to the predation pressure by the Cape fur seal Arctocephalus pusillus and the great white pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus, those threats weigh heavily on a vulnerable seabird population.