Writing Committee for the REMAP-CAP Investigators IMPORTANCE The evidence for benefit of convalescent plasma for critically ill patients with COVID-19 is inconclusive.OBJECTIVE To determine whether convalescent plasma would improve outcomes for critically ill adults with COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThe ongoing Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial, Adaptive Platform Trial for Community-Acquired Pneumonia (REMAP-CAP) enrolled and randomized 4763 adults with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 between March 9, 2020, and January 18, 2021, within at least 1 domain; 2011 critically ill adults were randomized to open-label interventions in the immunoglobulin domain at 129 sites in 4 countries. Follow-up ended on April 19, 2021. INTERVENTIONSThe immunoglobulin domain randomized participants to receive 2 units of high-titer, ABO-compatible convalescent plasma (total volume of 550 mL ± 150 mL) within 48 hours of randomization (n = 1084) or no convalescent plasma (n = 916). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary ordinal end point was organ support-free days (days alive and free of intensive care unit-based organ support) up to day 21 (range, −1 to 21 days; patients who died were assigned -1 day). The primary analysis was an adjusted bayesian cumulative logistic model. Superiority was defined as the posterior probability of an odds ratio (OR) greater than 1 (threshold for trial conclusion of superiority >99%). Futility was defined as the posterior probability of an OR less than 1.2 (threshold for trial conclusion of futility >95%). An OR greater than 1 represented improved survival, more organ support-free days, or both. The prespecified secondary outcomes included in-hospital survival; 28-day survival; 90-day survival; respiratory support-free days; cardiovascular support-free days; progression to invasive mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal mechanical oxygenation, or death; intensive care unit length of stay; hospital length of stay; World Health Organization ordinal scale score at day 14; venous thromboembolic events at 90 days; and serious adverse events. RESULTS Among the 2011 participants who were randomized (median age, 61 [IQR, 52 to 70] years and 645/1998 [32.3%] women), 1990 (99%) completed the trial. The convalescent plasma intervention was stopped after the prespecified criterion for futility was met. The median number of organ support-free days was 0 (IQR, -1 to 16) in the convalescent plasma group and 3 (IQR, -1 to 16) in the no convalescent plasma group. The in-hospital mortality rate was 37.3% (401/1075) for the convalescent plasma group and 38.4% (347/904) for the no convalescent plasma group and the median number of days alive and free of organ support was 14 (IQR, 3 to 18) and 14 (IQR, 7 to 18), respectively. The median-adjusted OR was 0.97 (95% credible interval, 0.83 to 1.15) and the posterior probability of futility (OR <1.2) was 99.4% for the convalescent plasma group compared with the no convalescent plasma group. The treatment effects were consistent across the primary outcome and the 11...

SUMMARYChemotherapy causes neutropenia and an increased susceptibility to infection. Recent reports indicate that mannan-binding lectin (MBL) insufficiency is associated with an increased duration of febrile neutropenia and incidence of serious infections following chemotherapy for haematological malignancies. We aimed to confirm or refute this finding and to extend the investigation to the plasma ficolins, P35 (Lficolin) and the Hakata antigen (H-ficolin). MBL, L-ficolin and H-ficolin were measured in 128 patients with haematological malignancies treated by chemotherapy alone or combined with bone marrow transplantation. Protein concentrations were related to clinical data retrieved from medical records. MBL concentrations were elevated compared with healthy controls in patients who received chemotherapy, while L-ficolin concentrations were decreased and H-ficolin levels were unchanged. There was no correlation between MBL, L-ficolin or H-ficolin concentration and febrile neutropenia expressed as the proportion of neutropenic periods in which patients experienced fever, and there was no relation between abnormally low (deficiency) levels of MBL, L-ficolin or H-ficolin and febrile neutropenia so expressed. Patients with MBL £ 0·1 m g/ml had significantly more major infections than no infections within the follow-up period ( P < 0·05), but overall most patients had signs or symptoms of minor infections irrespective of MBL concentration. Neither L-ficolin nor H-ficolin deficiencies were associated with infections individually, in combination or in combination with MBL deficiency. MBL, L-ficolin and H-ficolin, independently or in combination, did not have a major influence on susceptibility to infection in these patients rendered neutropenic by chemotherapy. These results cast doubt on the potential value of MBL replacement therapy in this clinical context.

Summary:A blinded prospective study was performed to determine whether screening of whole blood using a real-time, panfungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique could predict the development of invasive fungal infection (IFI) in immunocompromised haemato-oncology patients. In all, 78 patients (125 treatment episodes) were screened twice weekly by real-time panfungal PCR using LightCyclert technology. IFI was documented in 19 treatment episodes (five proven, three probable and 11 possible), and in 12, PCR was sequentially positive. PCR positivity occurred in: 4/5 proven; 2/3 probable; 6/11 possible; and 29/106 with no IFI. In 8/12 with IFI and sequentially positive PCR results, PCR positivity occurred before (median 19.5 days) and in 4/12 (median 10.5 days) after the initiation of empirical antifungal therapy. Based on sequential positive results for proven/probable IFI sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 75, 70, 15 and 98%, respectively. Real-time panfungal PCR is a sensitive tool for the early diagnosis of IFI in immunocompromised haemato-oncology patients. It may be most useful as a screening method in high-risk patients, either to direct early pre-emptive antifungal therapy or to determine when empirical antifungal therapy can be withheld in patients with antibiotic-resistant neutropenic fever. However, these strategies require further assessment in comparative clinical trials.

Summary Current laboratory diagnostic methods for invasive fungal infection (IFI) in haemato‐oncology patients are insensitive, resulting in late diagnosis and contributing to high mortality. In recent years, progress has been made in the development and evaluation of sensitive sero‐diagnostic assays, including detection of genomic DNA sequences and fungal antigens, which aid in a rapid, early diagnosis of IFI. The sensitivity and specificity of the assays vary considerably between studies, highlighting the need to correlate serological results with conventional laboratory tests and clinical or radiological findings. As part of management protocols, these assays may help to confirm the diagnosis of suspected IFI; however, the impact on mortality from IFI may be greatest when they are used to screen high‐risk patients. Persistently positive screening results could direct early aggressive antifungal therapy, guided further by radiological and microbiological findings combined with regular clinical review, while the excellent negative predictive value may allow treatment to be withheld in patients with antibiotic resistant neutropenic fever but no other signs of IFI. However, this pre‐emptive approach requires evaluation in prospective randomized trials.

Rapid serological and molecular diagnostic methods facilitate the early diagnosis of invasive fungal infection and would appear to be most useful when used prospectively to screen high-risk patients. However, in order to determine the optimal approach to treatment it is essential that these tests are incorporated into management strategies and their impact on incidence of invasive fungal infection and clinical outcome evaluated in further clinical trials.