The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Single-species acute toxicity data and (micro)mesocosm data were collated for 16 insecticides. These data were used to investigate the importance of test-species selection in constructing species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) and the ability of estimated hazardous concentrations (HCs) to protect freshwater aquatic ecosystems. A log-normal model was fitted to a minimum of six data points, and the resulting distribution was used to estimate lower (95% confidence), median (50% confidence), and upper (5% confidence) 5% HC (HC5) values. Species sensitivity distributions for specific taxonomic groups (vertebrates, arthropods, nonarthropod invertebrates), habitats (saltwater, freshwater, lentic, lotic), and geographical regions (Palaearctic, Nearctic, temperate, tropical) were compared. The taxonomic composition of the species assemblage used to construct the SSD does have a significant influence on the assessment of hazard, but the habitat and geographical distribution of the species do not. Moreover, SSDs constructed using species recommended in test guidelines did not differ significantly from those constructed using nonrecommended species. Hazardous concentrations estimated using laboratory-derived acute toxicity data for freshwater arthropods (i.e., the most sensitive taxonomic group) were compared to the response of freshwater ecosystems exposed to insecticides. The sensitivity distributions of freshwater arthropods were similar for both field and laboratory exposure, and the lower HC5 (95% protection with 95% confidence) estimate was protective of adverse ecological effects in freshwater ecosystems. The corresponding median HC5 (95% protection level with 50% confidence) was generally protective of single applications of insecticide but not of continuous or multiple applications. In the latter cases, a safety factor of at least five should be applied to the median HC5.

The risk assessment of fungicides in Europe uses information from ecotoxicity studies performed on vertebrates, invertebrates, and primary producers, but not nontarget fungi. But which toxicity data should be used to assess risk and how important are modes of action and exposure regimes? A data set was compiled comprising acute single-species toxicity data for 42 fungicides, semifield data for 12 fungicides, and covering seven toxic modes of action and different exposure regimes. Most fungicides were general biocides and data from all taxonomic groups were used to construct species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) and assess risk. The derived lower-limit HC5 values and HCl values were always protective of adverse ecological effects in semifield studies and HC5 values were protective for at least 3 of the fungicides. Expanding the analysis to include insecticides and herbicides, the following threshold values, derived from SSDs based on the most sensitive taxonomic group, are proposed to protect against adverse ecological effects from pesticide exposure: (i) the HC5 can be used for short-term exposures; (ii) the HC5 divided by 1.5 can be used for medium-term exposures; (iii) either the HCl or the HC5 divided by 3 can be used for long-term exposures.

Biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates has been used to assess water quality in Europe since the early 20th century. Most methods use community-level measurements, and the use of single-species responses has been limited, despite their potential benefits as sensitive, early warning indicators. Here we evaluate a single-species in situ assay in which the response is feeding inhibition of the freshwater amphipod Gammarus pulex. The assay was deployed in uncontaminated reference sites to quantify background variability in feeding rates and to elucidate sources of this variation. The ability of the assay to detect impacts of point-source discharges was assessed and the ecological relevance of the assay determined by comparing assay responses to aspects of community structure and functioning. Water temperature accounted for 76% of the variation in the feeding rate of animals deployed at uncontaminated sites, and summer deployments had a >90% power to detect a 30% inhibition in feeding. Inhibition of the situ feeding rate of G. pulex deployed downstream of a variety of point-source discharges ranged from 27 to 99.6%. Gammarus pulex is an important detritivore in stream communities, and a strong positive correlation existed between in situ feeding rate measured over 6 d and leaf decomposition measured over 28 d. A positive correlation also existed between in situ feeding and macroinvertebrate diversity and a biotic index. The G. pulex in situ feeding assay is a short-term sublethal biomonitor of water quality that is indicative of community- and ecosystem-level responses occurring over longer time periods. It is robust, responsive, and relevant.