Purpose: Methotrexate is known to synergize with cytarabine [1-h-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C)] in a schedule-dependent manner. The purpose of this article is to compare and contrast the activity of pralatrexate (10-propargyl-10-deazaminopterin)/gemcitabine to the standard combination of methotrexate/ara-C and to determine if schedule dependency of this combination is important in lymphoma. Experiment Design: Cytotoxicity assays using the standard trypan blue exclusion assay were used to explore the in vitro activity of pralatrexate and gemcitabine against a panel of lymphoma cell lines. Both severe combined imunodeficient beige and irradiated nonobese diabetic/severe combined imunodeficient mouse xenograft models were used to compare and contrast the in vivo activity of these combinations as a function of schedule. In addition, apoptosis assays were conducted. Results: Compared with methotrexate-containing combinations, pralatrexate plus gemcitabine combinations displayed improved therapeutic activity with some schedule dependency. The combination of pralatrexate and gemcitabine was superior to any methotrexate and ara-C combination in inducing apoptosis and in activating caspase-3. In vivo, the best therapeutic effects were obtained with the sequence of pralatrexate ! gemcitabine. Complete remissions were only appreciated in animals receiving pralatrexate followed by gemcitabine. Conclusions: These data show that the combination of pralatrexate followed by gemcitabine was superior to methotrexate/ara-C in vitro and in vivo, and was far more potent in inducing apoptosis in a large B-cell lymphoma. These data provide strong rationale for further study of this combination in lymphomas where methotrexate and ara-C are used.

Amniotic fluid embolism is a rare syndrome characterized by sudden cardiorespiratory collapse during labor or soon after delivery. Because of its rarity, many obstetrical providers have no experience in managing amniotic fluid embolism and may therefore benefit from a cognitive aid such as a checklist. We present a sample checklist for the initial management of amniotic fluid embolism based on standard management guidelines. We also suggest steps that each facility can take to implement the checklist effectively.

Purpose: To determine whether the combination of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and the bcl-2 antisense molecule oblimersen can sensitize human lymphoma to cyclophosphamide. Experimental Design: Cytotoxicity assays were conducted to determine if there was any additive or synergistic interaction between the combinations of bortezomib, oblimersen, and cyclophosphamide using a standard trypan blue exclusion assay. Based on these experiments, in vivo experiments in severe combined immunodeficiency beige mice were done using human lymphoma xenografts in which different schedules were explored. Bcl-2 and oblimersen levels were determined in treated tumors, some of which were resected at the end of the in vivo experiment and evaluated pathologically. Results:The results suggest that the combination of bortezomib and oblimersen seem to interact in at least an additive fashion, and that the addition of cyclophosphamide to this drug combination can markedly improve tumor cell kill. In addition, it seems that these drug combinations may be schedule-dependent, with a requirement for oblimersen pretreatment. Animals treated with the triplet drug combination in a schedule-dependent manner experienced pathologic complete regression of disease, which was not observed in other treatment cohorts. The addition of bortezomib also seemed to increase the levels of intracellular oblimersen, which resulted in a marked reduction in Bcl-2. Histologic studies confirmed marked necrosis and caspase-3 activation only in the cohort receiving all three drugs. Conclusion: The use of Bcl-2-directed therapy and a proteasome inhibitor sensitizes human lymphoma cells to cytotoxic drugs like cyclophosphamide. This combination may offer new opportunities for integrating novel targeted therapies with conventional chemotherapy.

Introduction Data regarding transplacental passage of maternal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antibodies and potential immunity in the newborn is limited. Case Report We present a 25-year-old multigravida with known red blood cell isoimmunization, who was found to be COVID-19 positive at 27 weeks of gestation while undergoing serial periumbilical blood sampling and intrauterine transfusions. Maternal COVID-19 antibody was detected 2 weeks after positive molecular testing. Antibodies were never detected on cord blood samples from two intrauterine fetal cord blood samples as well as neonatal cord blood at the time of delivery. Conclusion This case demonstrates a lack of passive immunity of COVID-19 antibodies from a positive pregnant woman to her fetus, neither in utero nor at the time of birth. Further studies are needed to understand if passage of antibodies can occur and if that can confer passive immunity in the newborn. Key Points

The lymphomas probably represent the most complex and heterogenous set of malignancies known to cancer medicine. Underneath the single term lymphoma exist some of the fastest growing cancers known to science (i.e Burkitt's and lymphoblastic lymphoma), as well as some of the slowest growing (i.e. small lymphocytic lymphoma [SLL] and follicular lymphoma). It is this very biology that can dictate the selection of drugs and treatment approaches for managing these patients, strategies that can range from very aggressive combination chemotherapy administered in an intensive care unit (for example, patients with Burkitt's lymphoma), to watch and wait approaches that may go on for years in patients with SLL. This impressive spectrum of biology emerges from a relatively restricted number of molecular defects. The importance of these different molecular defects is of course greatly influenced by the intrinsic biology that defines the lymphocyte at its different stages of differentiation and maturation. It is precisely this molecular understanding that is beginning to form the basis for a new approach to thinking about lymphoma, and novel approaches to its management. Unfortunately, while our understanding of human lymphoma has blossomed, our ability to generate appropriate animal models reflective of this biology has not. Most preclinical models of these diseases still rely upon sub-cutaneous xenograft models of only the most aggressive lymphomas like Burkitt's lymphoma. While these models clearly serve an important role in understanding biology, and perhaps more importantly, in identifying promising new drugs for these diseases, they fall short in truly representing the broader, more heterogenous biology found in patients. Clearly, depending upon the questions being posed, or the types of drugs being studied, the best model to employ may vary from situation to situation. In this article, we will review the numerous complexities associated with various animal models of lymphoma, and will try to explore several alternative models which might serve as better in vivo.