No abstract

Background People with hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) experience difficulties adapting their gait to meet environmental demands, a skill required for safe and independent ambulation. Gait adaptability training is possible on the C-Mill, a treadmill equipped with augmented reality, enabling visual projections to serve as stepping targets or obstacles. It is unknown whether gait adaptability can be trained in people with HSP. Aim The aim of Move-HSP is to study the effects of ten 1-h sessions of C-Mill training, compared with usual care, on gait adaptability in people with pure HSP. In addition, this study aims to identify key determinants of C-Mill training efficacy in people with pure HSP. Method Move-HSP is a 5-week, two-armed, open-label randomized controlled trial with a cross-over design for the control group. Thirty-six participants with pure HSP will be included. After signing informed consent, participants are randomized (1:1) to intervention or control group. All participants register (near) falls for 15 weeks, followed by the first assessment (week 16), and, thereafter, wear an Activ8 activity monitor for 7 days (week 16). The intervention group receives 10 sessions of C-Mill training (twice per week, 1-h sessions; weeks 17–21), whereas control group continues with usual care (weeks 17–21). Afterwards, both groups are re-assessed (week 22). Subsequently, the intervention group enter follow-up, whereas control group receives 10 sessions of C-Mill training (weeks 23–27), is re-assessed (week 28), and enters follow-up. During follow-up, both groups wear Activ8 activity monitors for 7 days (intervention group: week 23, control group: week 29) and register (near) falls for 15 weeks (intervention group: weeks 23–37, control group: weeks 29–43), before the final assessment (intervention group: week 38, control group: week 44). The primary outcome is the obstacle subtask of the Emory Functional Ambulation Profile. Secondary outcomes consist of clinical tests assessing balance and walking capacity, physical activity, and fall monitoring. Discussion Move-HSP will be the first RCT to assess the effects of C-Mill gait adaptability training in people with pure HSP. It will provide proof of concept for the efficacy of gait adaptability training in people with pure HSP. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04180098. Registered on November 27, 2019.

Trunk training is effective in restoring symmetry in muscle thickness to improve muscle strength. The gain in muscle thickness is specific to the applied exercise program, suggesting that therapeutic goal setting is of great importance. However, no conclusion could be made concerning changes in muscle activity due to a high risk of bias. Implications for rehabilitation: Trunk training seems to be effective in restoring symmetry in trunk muscle thickness. Not all muscle groups benefit from specific trunk exercises. Patients suffering from chronic stroke are still capable of restoring muscle function.

Background and objectives In people with hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP), reduced gait adaptability is common and disabling. Gait impairments result from lower extremity spasticity, muscle weakness, and impaired proprioception. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a 5-week gait-adaptability training in people with pure HSP. Method We conducted a randomized clinical trial with a cross-over design for the control group, and a 15-week follow-up period after training. Thirty-six people with pure HSP were randomized to 5 weeks of (i) gait-adaptability training (10 hours of C-Mill training—a treadmill equipped with augmented reality) or (ii) a waiting-list control period followed by 5 weeks gait-adaptability training. Both groups continued to receive usual care. The primary outcome was the obstacle subtask of the Emory Functional Ambulation Profile. Secondary outcome measures consisted of clinical balance and gait assessments, fall rates, and spatiotemporal gait parameters assessed via 3D motion analysis. Results The gait-adaptability training group (n = 18) did not significantly decrease the time required to perform the obstacle subtask compared to the waiting-list control group (n = 18) after adjusting for baseline differences (mean: −0.33 seconds, 95% CI: −1.3, 0.6). Similar, non-significant results were found for most secondary outcomes. After merging both groups (n = 36), the required time to perform the obstacle subtask significantly decreased by 1.3 seconds (95% CI: −2.1, −0.4) directly following 5 weeks of gait-adaptability training, and this effect was retained at the 15-week follow-up. Conclusions We found insufficient evidence to conclude that 5 weeks of gait-adaptability training leads to greater improvement of gait adaptability in people with pure HSP.

Objective Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) is characterized by a bilaterally spastic gait pattern. During gait, increased trunk movements are often observed. People with HSP likely generate trunk movements to improve foot clearance and step length, but there may be additional explanations. Here, we investigate whether there is an association between reduced balance performance and increased trunk movements, as an increase in trunk movements may partly reflect balance correcting strategies. Methods We analyzed an historic cohort of 86 people with HSP who underwent gait analysis and balance examination. Two researchers reviewed gait analyses videos and classified the observed trunk movement as (1) normal, (2) moderately increased, or (3) markedly increased, and categorized participants as ‘toe walkers’ (yes/no). Balance performance and spatiotemporal gait parameters were collected from the medical files. Parameters were compared between people with normal vs. moderately increased trunk movements, moderately vs. markedly increased trunk movements, and normal vs. markedly increased trunk movements. Results Patients with moderately increased trunk movements during gait scored lower on the Berg Balance Scale (p = 0.002) and/or the Mini Balance Evaluation Test (p = 0.043) than patients with normal trunk movements. Likewise, patients with markedly increased trunk movements performed worse on the BBS (p = 0.037) and/or the Mini-BESTest (p = 0.004) than patients with moderately increased trunk movements. Patients with markedly increased trunk movements were more often toe walkers than patients with moderately increased (68% vs. 6%; p < 0.001). Conclusions We found an association between increased trunk movements and reduced balance capacity. This may have several—not mutually exclusive—explanations. One of these explanations is that trunk movements, at least partly, reflect balance correcting strategies. With the disease progression, ankle strategies and foot placement strategies become impaired and insufficient to restore balance after intrinsic perturbations. Hip strategies are then potentially recruited to maintain balance, resulting in increased trunk movements.