BACKGROUND Pedicle transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous (pTRAM) flaps remain the most common method of autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Using pTRAM flaps, complications often arise postoperatively, secondary to inadequate circulation. Tissues from distant angiosomes are associated with poorer perfusion, but this differs among patients. Many modalities have been used to reduce the risk of complications, but none have achieved widespread application. The authors believe that laser-assisted indocyanine green fluorescent dye angiography (LA-ICGA) can potentially reduce the risk of complications. METHODS In two routine, single-pedicle, ipsilateral pTRAM flaps, LA-ICGA imaging was performed following the division of the distal rectus muscle and deep inferior epigastric pedicle. The resulting images were used to guide design of the flap and debridement. RESULTS In case 1, good perfusion was observed in zone 1 and part of zone 2. In case 2, good perfusion was observed in zone 1 and 50% of zone 3, with little perfusion in zone 2. In both cases, tissues with poor perfusion were debrided before transfer and inset. In both patients, there were no issues with wound healing, tissue necrosis or fat necrosis. CONCLUSIONS The variability of perfusion of the pTRAM flap among individuals is well appreciated. LA-ICGA helped to determine the limits of good perfusion and, therefore, the limits of tissue to be preserved for transfer and inset. This helped to avoid harvesting poorly perfused tissue that would have almost certainly experienced necrosis and, ultimately, would have reduced the risk of postoperative complications.

Background We desired information from the recent, current, and future matched hand surgery fellows regarding their residency training, number of interviews, position matched, cost of interviewing, influences, opinions on future hand training models, and post-fellowship job information. Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained from our institution to submit an online survey. An email was sent to the coordinators of all US Hand Fellowships to be forwarded to their fellows with graduation years 2011, 2012, and 2013, as well as directly to the fellows if their email addresses were provided. Data on the application process, relative importance of program attributes, and opinions regarding optimal training of a hand surgeon were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with respect to the training background and graduation year of the respondent. Results The survey was completed by 137 hand surgery fellows. Seventy-one percent of the survey responders were from an orthopedic residency background, 20 % from plastic, and 7 % from general surgery. Forty-four percent of all of the respondents matched into their first choice. The type of operative cases performed by the current fellows was most often selected as very important when making their rank list. Seventy-seven percent of the respondents reflected their personal preference in fellowship model to be a 1-year fellowship program. Conclusions The field of hand surgery is unique in that it has residents from multiple training backgrounds who all apply to one fellowship. The current fellowship model allows for diversity of training and the possibility of obtaining a second fellowship if desired.

No abstract