Organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) plays a role in hepatic uptake of drugs, affecting in vivo exposure, distinguished primarily through pharmacogenetics of the SLC22A1 gene. The role of OCT1 in vivo has not been confirmed, however, via drug-drug interactions that similarly affect exposure. In the current research, we used Oct1/2 knockout mice to assess the role of Oct1 in hepatic clearance and liver partitioning of clinical substrates and assess the model for predicting an effect of OCT1 function on pharmacokinetics in humans. Four OCT1 substrates (sumatriptan, fenoterol, ondansetron, and tropisetron) were administered to wild-type and knockout mice, and plasma, tissue, and urine were collected. Tissue transporter expression was evaluated using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. In vitro, uptake of all compounds in human and mouse hepatocytes and human OCT1-and OCT2-expressing cells was evaluated. The largest effect of knockout was on hepatic clearance and liver partitioning of sumatriptan (2-to 5-fold change), followed by fenoterol, whereas minimal changes in the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron and tropisetron were observed. This aligned with uptake in mouse hepatocytes, in which inhibition of uptake of sumatriptan and fenoterol into mouse hepatocytes by an OCT1 inhibitor was much greater compared with ondansetron and tropisetron. Conversely, inhibition of all four substrates was evident in human hepatocytes, in line with reported clinical pharmacogenetic data. These data confirm the role of Oct1 in the hepatic uptake of the four OCT1 substrates and elucidate species differences in OCT1mediated hepatocyte uptake that should be considered when utilizing the model to predict effects in humans. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTStudies in carriers of SLC22A1 null variants indicate a role of organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) in the hepatic uptake of therapeutic agents, although OCT1-mediated drug-drug interactions have not been reported. This work used Oct1/2 knockout mice to confirm the role of Oct1 in the hepatic clearance and liver partitioning in mice for OCT1 substrates with reported pharmacogenetic effects. Species differences observed in mouse and human hepatocyte uptake clarify limitations of the knockout model for predicting exposure changes in humans for some OCT1 substrates.
The enterohepatic circulation (EHC) of drugs is often the result of the direct glucuronidation, excretion of the metabolite into bile, followed by hydrolysis to the aglycone by the gut microbiome and finally reabsorption of drug into the systemic circulation. The aim of present study to identify key factors in determining the EHC in dog for canagliflozin and DPTQ, two compounds cleared by UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) mediated O‐alkyl glucuronidation and cytochrome P450 (P450) mediated oxidation. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the drugs were compared between bile duct cannulated (BDC) and intact beagle dogs after a single intravenous administration. A long terminal elimination phase was observed for DPTQ but not for canagliflozin in intact dogs, while this long terminal half‐life was not seen in BDC animals, suggesting the EHC of DPTQ. Quantification of parent drugs and glucuronide metabolites in bile, urine and feces indicated low recovery of parent in bile and urine and low recovery of conjugated metabolites in urine for both drugs, while biliary excretion of these glucuronide metabolites in BDC dog were low for canagliflozin but much higher for DPTQ. The increased fecal recovery of parent drug in intact dog and the lack of glucuronide metabolites suggested the hydrolysis of DPTQ‐glucuronides by gut microbiome. Subsequent characterization of in vitro hepatic metabolism and permeability properties indicated the hepatic fraction metabolized by UGT, hydrolysis of metabolites, and reabsorption of the aglycone were key factors in determining the EHC of DPTQ.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.