Including posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA) into consideration may increase the accuracy of astigmatism correction after corneal refractive surgery. In the present study we aim to investigate the distribution pattern of PCA in a large number of myopic patients from multiple ophthalmic centers. There were 7829 eyes retrospectively included in the study. Pentacam data of the eyes were retrieved from the machine and only results with image quality labelled with ‘OK’ were included. Distribution of PCA was slightly positively skewed (Skewness = 0.419, Kurtosis = 0.435, KS P < 0.0001). Mean PCA was 0.34 ± 0.14 D (range: 0.00 D-0.99 D). PCA was ≥ 0.25 D in 74.91% of the eyes and was ≥ 0.50 D in 11.61% of the eyes. In 97.55% of the eyes the steep meridian of PCA was vertical (SMV). PCA magnitude was significantly higher in eyes with SMV PCA (P < 0.0001) or high manifest astigmatism (MA, P < 0.0001). There was a significant correlation between anterior corneal astigmatism (ACA) magnitude and PCA magnitude in all of the eyes (r = 0.704, P < 0.0001). There was also a trend of decreasing frequency and magnitude of SMV PCA with aging (both P < 0.0001). In conclusion, PCA is present in myopic patients having corneal refractive surgery and PCA magnitude is increased with higher MA or ACA. Consideration of the impact of PCA on laser astigmatism correction may be necessary.

It is essential to know the normal range of the interocular symmetry of the cornea (ISC) for keratoconus diagnosis and corneal substitutes design. In the present study we investigated the interocular symmetry of corneal biometrics in 6,644 Chinese myopic patients from multiple ophthalmic centers. Corneal biometrics of both eyes were exported from the Pentacam instrument. Interocular symmetry of the corneal biometrics was analyzed by Spearman’s correlation test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis and Bland–Altman plot. Significantly strong interocular correlations were found in anterior and posterior corneal curvatures, corneal diameter, corneal thickness, corneal volume, corneal eccentricity, and corneal asphericity (r = 0.87–0.98, all P < 0.001). Moderate interocular correlations were observed in whole corneal astigmatism (r = 0.78) and posterior corneal astigmatism (r = 0.73). ICC between the right and left eyes was 0.94–0.98 for anterior and posterior corneal curvatures, corneal diameter, corneal thickness and corneal volume, 0.80–0.88 for corneal eccentricity and asphericity, and 0.73–0.79 for corneal astigmatism (all P < 0.001). Bland–Altman plot showed that the 95% limit of agreement between both eyes was narrow and symmetric in most of the corneal biometrics, suggesting strong interocular agreements in these corneal biometrics. In conclusion, significant interocular symmetry of corneal biometrics is observed in Chinese myopia patients. Extra attention should be paid to patients with interocular corneal asymmetry.

PURPOSE: To observe the epithelial remodeling over a 9-mm diameter cornea induced by topography-guided femtosecond laser–assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia correction using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). METHODS: Forty-three eyes of 22 patients who underwent topography-guided FS-LASIK for myopic correction were included. The “Pachymetrywide” scan pattern was used to generate the epithelial thickness map using SD-OCT preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Epithelial thickness was compared and analyzed by section and zone. RESULTS: Compared to the preoperative values, the change in the average epithelial thickness in the central, paracentral, and mid-peripheral zones was 2.09, 4.53, and −0.87 µm at 1 month; 3.00, 4.61, and −0.97 µm at 3 months; and 3.28, 4.55, and −0.81 µm at 6 months postoperatively, respectively. From 1 to 3 months postoperatively, the central epithelial thickness changed significantly ( P = .021), whereas the epithelial thickness in the paracentral ( P = .973) and mid-peripheral ( P = .996) zones stabilized. No significant epithelial thickness change was observed in the zones between 3 and 6 months postoperatively (all P > .05). The epithelial thickness in the paracentral inferotemporal section increased by 12.7% at 6 months after surgery. The central epithelial hyperplasia showed no correlation with the change in postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent ( P = .313). CONCLUSIONS: After topography-guided FS-LASIK, the 9-mm diameter epithelial thickness showed a longitudinal and regional non-uniform redistribution. Central epithelial remodeling stabilized more slowly. The greatest increase in epithelial thickness was observed in the paracentral inferotemporal section. This epithelial remodeling did not cause refractive regression. [ J Refract Surg . 2019;35(2):88–95.]

PURPOSE: To describe the visual outcomes of correcting moderate to high hyperopia after two different surgical procedures of lenticular implantation. METHODS: This prospective small case series study used epikeratophakia combined with transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK-EP) and femtosecond laser–assisted lenticule intrastromal keratoplasty (LIKE) using myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)–derived refractive lenticule for correcting hyperopia ranging from +3.00 to +10.00 diopters (D). The implanted refractive lenticule was matched with the recipient's manifest refraction. The visual, refractive, corneal tomographic, and epithelial thickness outcomes were analyzed after surgery. RESULTS: Four eyes underwent PTK-EP and 6 eyes underwent LIKE. At the last postoperative visit, 6 of 10 eyes had uncorrected distance visual acuity equal to or better than the preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). No eyes lost one line or more of CDVA postoperatively. Postoperative spherical equivalent was within ±0.50 D of the target for 9 of 10 eyes. Posterior corneal curvature slightly steepened for PTK-EP and LIKE. Postoperative epithelial thickness demonstrated the expected doughnut pattern in both groups characterized by epithelium in the central zone (5 mm) thinner than that in the peripheral zone (5 to 7 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Visual outcomes, refraction, posterior corneal surface changes, and epithelial remodeling after PTKEP or LIKE show a potentially useful modality for correcting moderate to high hyperopia. [ J Refract Surg . 2020;36(11):772–779.]

Background To characterize the quality of vision after SMILE, FS-LASIK, and ICL implantation and evaluate the related factors. Methods 131 eyes of 131 myopic patients (90 female, 41 male) who underwent refractive surgeries including SMILE (35 patients), FS-LASIK (73 patients), and ICL implantation (23 patients) were analyzed. The Quality of Vision questionnaires were completed 3 months after surgery, and the results were characterized and analyzed with baseline characteristics, treatment parameters, and postoperative refractive outcomes using logistic regression analysis to find out predicted factors. Results Mean age was 26.5 ± 4.6 years (range: 18 to 39 years) and mean preoperative spherical equivalent was − 4.95 ± 2.04 diopters (D) (range: -1.5 to -13.5). Safety and efficacy index was comparable between different techniques: the safety index was 1.21 ± 0.18, 1.22 ± 0.18, and 1.22 ± 0.16 and the efficacy index were 1.18 ± 0.20, 1.15 ± 0.17, 1.17 ± 0.15 for SMILE, FS-LASIK and ICL respectively. The mean overall QoV score was 13.40 ± 9.11, with mean frequency, severity, and bothersome score of 5.40 ± 3.29, 4.53 ± 3.04, and 3.48 ± 3.18 respectively, and there was no significant difference between different techniques. Overall, the symptom with the highest scores was glare, following fluctuation in vision and halos. Only the scores of halos were significantly different among different techniques (P < 0.000). Using ordinal regression analysis, mesopic pupil size was identified as a risk factor (OR = 1.63, P = 0.037), while postoperative UDVA was a protective factor (OR = 0.036, P = 0.037) for overall QoV scores. Using binary logistic regression analysis, we found that patients with larger mesopic pupil size had an increased risk to experience glare postoperatively; compared to ICL, patients who underwent SMILE or FS-LASIK tended to report fewer halos; patients with better postoperative UDVA were less likely to report blurred vision and focusing difficulty; with larger residual myopic sphere postoperatively, patients experienced focusing difficulties and difficulty judging distance or depth perception more frequently. Conclusions SMILE, FS-LASIK, and ICL had comparable visual outcomes. Overall, glare, fluctuation in vision, and halos were the most frequently experienced visual symptoms 3 months postoperatively. Patients with ICL implanted tended to report halos more frequently compared with SMILE and FS-LASIK. Mesopic pupil size, postoperative UDVA, and postoperative residual myopic sphere were predicted factors for reported visual symptoms.