The acyl-CoA-binding protein (ACBP) is a 10-kDa intracellular protein that specifically binds acyl-CoA esters with high affinity and is structurally and functionally conserved from yeast to mammals. In vitro studies indicate that ACBP may regulate the availability of acylCoA esters for various metabolic and regulatory purposes. The protein is particularly abundant in cells with a high level of lipogenesis and de novo fatty acid synthesis and is significantly induced during adipocyte differentiation. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of ACBP expression in mammalian cells have remained largely unknown. Here we report that ACBP is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)␥ target gene. The rat ACBP gene is directly activated by PPAR␥/retinoid X receptor ␣ (RXR␣) and PPAR␣/RXR␣, but not by PPAR␦/RXR␣, through a PPAR-response element in intron 1, which is functionally conserved in the human ACBP gene. The intronic PPAR-response element (PPRE) mediates induction by endogenous PPAR␥ in murine adipocytes and confers responsiveness to the PPAR␥-selective ligand BRL49653. Finally, we have used chromatin immunoprecipitation to demonstrate that the intronic PPRE efficiently binds PPAR␥/RXR in its natural chromatin context in adipocytes. Thus, the PPRE in intron 1 of the ACBP gene is a bona fide PPAR␥-response element.

Transcriptional regulation at the level of chromatin plays crucial roles during eukaryotic development and di erentiation. A plethora of studies revealed that the acetylation status of histones is controlled by multiprotein complexes containing (de)acetylase activities. In the current model, histone deacetylases and acetyltransferases are recruited to chromatin by DNA-bound repressors and activators, respectively. Shifting the balance between deacetylation, i.e. repressive chromatin and acetylation, i.e. active chromatin can lead to aberrant gene transcription and cancer. In human acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and avian erythroleukemia (AEL), chromosomal translocations and/or mutations in nuclear hormone receptors, RARa

contributed equally to this workTo assess the mechanisms of repression of the erythroid-speci®c carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) locus we used chromatin immunoprecipitation and show that an NCoR±histone deacetylase (HDAC)3 complex is recruited by the nuclear receptor v-ErbA to the intronic HS2 enhancer turning it into a potent silencer. Furthermore we demonstrate that ef®cient CAII silencing requires binding of a MeCP2-targeted HDAC-containing corepressor complex to the hypermethylated CpG-island at the promoter. Activation of transcription by either AZAdC or thyroid hormone results in loss of one of the two corepressor complexes. Thyroid hormone further replaces the enhancerbound NCoR±corepressor complex by the TRAP220 coactivator. Treatment with the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) causes activation of CAII transcription and histone H3 and H4 hyperacetylation at the enhancer, apparently without affecting binding of the two corepressor complexes. Unexpectedly, histone H3 and H4 at the fully repressed promoter are already hyperacetylated despite the close apposition of the MeCP2-targeted HDAC complex. Acetylation of histone H4, but not H3, at the promoter is moderately increased following TSA treatment. Our data suggest that the hyperacetylated but repressed CAII promoter is (partially) remodeled and primed for activation in v-ErbA-transformed cells.

Active promoters generally contain histone H3/H4 hyperacetylation and tri-methylation at H3 lysine 4, whereas repressed promoters are associated with DNA methylation. Here we show that the repressed erythroid-specific carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) promoter has active histone modifications localized around the transcription start, while high levels of CpG methylation are present directly upstream from these active marks. Despite the presence of active histone modifications, the repressed promoter requires hormone-induced activation for efficient preinitiation complex assembly. Transient and positional changes in histone H3/H4 acetylation and local changes in nucleosome density are evident during activation, but the bipartite epigenetic code is stably maintained. Our results suggest that active histone modifications may prevent spreading of CpG methylation towards the promoter and show that repressive DNA methylation immediately adjacent to a promoter does not necessarily repress transcription.

The human insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) gene contains four promoters that are differentially active during cell growth and development. Promoter 3 (P3) is the most active promoter in fetal and non-hepatic adult tissues. In addition to its expression during development, P3 is also the major promoter in many tumour tissues and IGF-II-expressing cell lines. Here we show that AP-2 has a dual function in P3 regulation in vivo as well as in vitro. In cells expressing low levels of endogenous AP-2, AP-2 overexpression activates P3, whereas P3 promoter activity is inhibited in cells containing abundant AP-2. Four potential AP-2-binding sites were identified in footprinting studies with recombinant AP-2. One of these AP-2-binding sites is located within the previously identified element P3-4 that contains two adjacent binding sites for IGF-II promoter-binding proteins IPBP3 and IPBP4/5. By applying binding competition assays and mutational analysis it is shown that AP-2 interferes with IPBP3 binding and transactivation in vivo as well as in vitro. Furthermore, AP-2 can bind additional elements in the proximal P3 promoter that also contribute to AP-2-mediated transactivation as shown by transient transfection assays. From these results we conclude that AP-2 is an important regulator in vivo and in vitro of IGF-II P3 activity.