Introduction Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) have a profound impact on physical, social, and sexual well-being. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) may have a positive effect on sexuality, though few studies have so far evaluated its impact on female sexual function. Aim To prospectively assess changes in sexual function, clinical outcome and quality of life after SNM in female patients with overactive bladder (OAB) and their possible correlation with improvement in urinary symptoms and quality of life indexes. Main Outcome Measures Correlations between differences in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores and in clinical outcome and correlations between differences in FSFI, SF36, and IQoL scores were evaluated by Spearman’s coefficient. Comparison between preoperative, midterm follow-up (MFU), and last follow-up (FFU) visits were performed by generalized linear model (GLM) for repeated measurements. Methods Between May 2003 and December 2008, 30 consecutive female patients (median age 53 years, range 35–79) with OAB underwent the two-stage procedure of SNM. Only 16 (53%) patients were considered eligible; these completed a bladder diary, the FSFI, the Status of Health questionnaire (SF36) and the Incontinence Quality of Life Index (IQoL) before implantation and on follow-up examinations. Results The results were analyzed before implantation, on MFU (median MFU 22.5 months) and on FFU (median FFU period 36.3 months). Regarding sexuality, the mean improvement in the total FSFI score was 27.9% on MFU and 29.3% on FFU. Only four patients (25%) showed a >50% improvement in global FSFI score on MFU, and 3 (25%) on FFU. A significant correlation was found between clinical improvement and improvement in sexual function. No significant correlation was found between differences in FSFI and quality of life indexes (IQoL and SF36). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that improvement in the quality of sexual function in female patients with OAB correlates with improvement in urinary symptoms.
Objective To systematically identify and appraise the existing literature on the association between polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and vascular disease. Methods The Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to September 2010. Search criteria included observational studies containing patients with isolated PMR reporting on a vascular outcome. Data were extracted and articles were assessed for quality. Results The database search identified 545 articles. Eight articles reporting on 7 unique studies were included in the final review. Four studies reported on vascular mortality and 3 studies reported on other vascular outcomes. Four of the studies reported statistically significant positive associations between PMR and vascular disease and 3 studies reported no statistically significant results. The heterogeneity of the results was investigated; the strongest explanatory variable was that 2 of 3 studies that reported nonsignificant results were prospective, whereas all of those studies reporting significant results were retrospective. Conclusion There is some evidence to suggest that, like other inflammatory rheumatic disorders, PMR may be linked to an increased risk of vascular disease. Further studies are required to quantify the level of risk to determine whether patients with PMR should be actively screened for cardiovascular disease and its risk factors.
Overall, IPSS scores improved significantly following TURP and sexual function scored declined mildly. We detected no influence between surgeons on clinical voiding parameters and postoperative sexual function after TURP using the IPSS and IIEF-15 questionnaires.
ZusammenfassungWir berichten über eine 66-jährige neuro-urologische Patientin, die 3 Jahre nach Implantation eines Neuromodulators aufgrund einer Strangulation durch das Stimulationskabel eine Nekrose des Zäkums erlitt.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.