Aims
Inefficient ventricular–arterial (V–A) coupling has been described in Fontan patients and may result in adverse haemodynamics. A varying amount of aortopulmonary collateral (APC) flow is also frequently present that increases volume load of the single ventricle. The aim of the study was to assess changes in V–A coupling and APC flow during exercise CMR.
Methods and results
Eighteen Fontan patients (age 24 ± 3 years) and 14 controls (age 23 ± 4 years) underwent exercise CMR using a cycle ergometer. Ventricular volumetry and flow measurements in the ascending aorta (AAO), inferior (IVC), and superior (SVC) vena cava were assessed using real-time sequences during stepwise increases in work load. Measures of systemic arterial elastance Ea, ventricular elastance Ees, and V–A coupling (Ea/Ees) were assessed. APC flow was quantified as AAO − (SVC + IVC). Ea remained unchanged during all levels of exercise in both groups (P = 0.39 and P = 0.11). Ees increased in both groups (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001) with exercise but was lower in the Fontan group (P = 0.04). V–A coupling was impaired in Fontan patients at baseline (P = 0.04). Despite improvement during exercise (P = 0.002) V–A coupling remained impaired compared with controls (P = 0.001). Absolute APC flow in Fontan patients did not change during exercise even at maximum work load (P = 0.98).
Conclusions
Inefficient V–A coupling was already present at rest in Fontan patients and aggravated during exercise due to a limited increase in ventricular contractility which demonstrates the importance of a limited functional reserve of the single ventricle. APC flow remained unchanged suggesting no further increase in volume load during exercise.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.