BackgroundThe most common microcytic and hypochromic anemias are iron deficiency anemia and thalassemia trait. Several indices to discriminate iron deficiency anemia from thalassemia trait have been proposed as simple diagnostic tools. However, some of the best discriminative indices use parameters in the formulas that are only measured in modern counters and are not always available in small laboratories.The development of an index with good diagnostic accuracy based only on parameters derived from the blood cell count obtained using simple counters would be useful in the clinical routine. Thus, the aim of this study was to develop and validate a discriminative index to differentiate iron deficiency anemia from thalassemia trait.MethodsTo develop and to validate the new formula, blood count data from 106 (thalassemia trait: 23 and iron deficiency: 83) and 185 patients (thalassemia trait: 30 and iron deficiency: 155) were used, respectively. Iron deficiency, β-thalassemia trait and α-thalassemia trait were confirmed by gold standard tests (low serum ferritin for iron deficiency anemia, HbA2 > 3.5% for β-thalassemia trait and using molecular biology for the α-thalassemia trait).ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, efficiency, Youden's Index, area under receiver operating characteristic curve and Kappa coefficient of the new formula, called the Matos & Carvalho Index were 99.3%, 76.7%, 95.7%, 76.0, 0.95 and 0.83, respectively.ConclusionThe performance of this index was excellent with the advantage of being solely dependent on the mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration and red blood cell count obtained from simple automatic counters and thus may be of great value in underdeveloped and developing countries.
Background
Racial differences in genetic risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) are elucidated, with factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A being prevalent among the Caucasian population but rare among non‐Caucasians.
Objectives
To assess the worldwide distribution of three gene polymorphisms previously identified as genetic risk factors among East Asian subpopulations: protein S (PS) Tokushima (p.Lys196Glu), protein C (PC) p.Arg189Trp, and PC p.Lys193del.
Methods
An international collaborative study group of seven centers in five countries—Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Hungary, and Brazil—was created, and genotype analyses were performed. A total of 2850 unrelated individuals (1061 patients with VTE and 1789 controls) were included.
Results
PS Tokushima was confined to Japanese patients with VTE (allele frequency, 2.35%) and controls (1.12%), with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.15 (95% confidence interval, 1.16‐3.99). PC p.Arg189Trp carriers were prevalent among Chinese and Malay patients with VTE in Singapore, with allele frequencies of 10.53% and 22.73%, respectively. Carriers of PC p.Lys193del were identified among Japanese and Korean patients with VTE (0.87% and 2.35%, respectively) and controls (0.36% and 1.07%, respectively), with the OR for VTE not being significant, and Chinese patients with VTE in Singapore (5.26%). In contrast, no carriers of PS Tokushima and two PC gene variants were found among patients with VTE or controls from Hungary, Brazil, or Indians in Singapore.
Conclusion
The three variants were prevalent among East and Southeast Asians, having some differences in geographic distribution, but were absent among Caucasian subpopulations and Brazilians.
Chronic inflammation in PE, in spite of increased levels of LXA4, points to a possible failure in this regulatory pathway. Further studies are necessary to clarify this issue and to evaluate the role of LXA4 and other proresolving mediators of inflammation in the pathogenesis of PE.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.