Purpose: To study the differences in the prevalence, risk, and grade of control of different cardiometabolic comorbidities in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) and essential hypertension (EH) matched by age, sex, and blood pressure levels at diagnosis. Methods: Case-control study of a secondary base (PA patients in follow-up in a tertiary hospital between 2018-20). Controls were patients with EH, matched by age, sex, and baseline diastolic (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP).Results: Fifty patients with PA and 50 controls were enrolled in the study. At diagnosis, PA patients had a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) than controls (18.4% vs. 2.1%, P=0.008). No differences were detected in the prevalence of other cardiometabolic comorbidities nor in their degree of control (P>0.05). All patients received antihypertensive medical treatment and 10 PA patients underwent unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy.After a median follow-up of 31.9 [IQR=1.0-254.8] months, PA patients presented a greater degree of declination of kidney function than controls (Average decrease in glomerular ltration rate (MDRD-4) -17.6±3.1 vs -2.8±1.8 ml/min/1.73m 2 , P<0.001). There were no differences in the grade of SBP (P=0.840) and DBP control (P=0.191), nor in the risk of developing other comorbidities or in their degree of control.Conclusions: PA patients have a prevalence of CKD ten times higher than those with EH matched by age, sex, and blood pressure levels. Furthermore, the risk of kidney function impairment throughout the followup is signi cantly greater in PA patients and is independent of the degree of blood pressure control.
A detailed anamnesis and physical examination are key to the correct diagnosis in a woman with hyperandrogenism independent of her circulating androgen profile.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the different tests commonly used in the evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) for the identification of autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) and comorbidities potentially related to ACS. In a retrospective study of patients with AIs ≥ 1 cm, we evaluated the diagnostic reliability and validity of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST), urinary free cortisol (UFC), ACTH, late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC), and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate (DHEAS) for the diagnosis of comorbidities potentially related to ACS. Diagnostic indexes were also calculated for UFC, ACTH, LNSC, and DHEAS considering DST as the gold standard test for the diagnosis of ACS, using three different post-DST cortisol thresholds (138 nmol/L, 50 nmol/L and 83 nmol/L). We included 197 patients with AIs in whom the results of the five tests abovementioned were available. At diagnosis, 85.9% of patients with one or more AIs had any comorbidity potentially related to ACS, whereas 9.6% had ACS as defined by post-DST cortisol > 138 nmol/L. The reliability of UFC, ACTH, LNSC, and DHEAS for the diagnosis of ACS was low (kappa index < 0.30). Of them, LNSC reached the highest diagnosis accuracy for ACS identification (AUC = 0.696 [95% CI 0.626–0.759]). The diagnostic performances of these tests for comorbidities potentially related to ACS was poor; of them, the DST was the most accurate (AUC = 0.661 [95% CI 0.546–0.778]) and had the strongest association with these comorbidities (OR 2.6, P = 0.045). Patients presenting with increased values of both DST and LNSC had the strongest association with hypertension (OR 7.1, P = 0.002) and with cardiovascular events (OR 3.6, P = 0.041). In conclusion, LNSC was the test showing the highest diagnosis accuracy for the identification of ACS when a positive DST was used as the gold standard for its diagnosis. The DST test showed the strongest association with comorbidities potentially related to ACS. The definition of ACS based on the combination of elevated DST and LNSC levels improved the identification of patients with increased cardiometabolic risk.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.