The pilates method can be used by patients with LBP to improve pain, function and aspects related to quality of life (functional capacity, pain and vitality). Moreover, this method has no harmful effects on such patients.
BackgroundFibromyalgia (FM) is defined as a chronic syndrome characterized by diffuse musculoskeletal pain and several symptoms that reflect on the functional capacity and quality of life of the affected patients. Different types of exercises are recommended in the treatment of FM. Pilates is a method of physical conditioning that has been frequently used in rehabilitation programs, due to the benefits perceived in musculoskeletal disorders, as well as in other conditions.ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of Pilates method compared to aerobic exercise in pain, quality of life related to the disease, depression, quality of life in general, functional capacity, kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, treatment satisfaction and reduction in the use of medication by women presenting FM.MethodsSixty-six female patients diagnosed with FM were included, aging 18 to 65, presenting pain between 3 to 8 in numerical pain scale (NPS). Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, neurological diseases, under psychiatric treatment, who have started or changed physical activities or medication in the last three months, patients with uncontrolled cardiorespiratory and cardiovascular diseases or any condition that may limit the practice of exercises, with non-diabetes mellitus controlled and other musculoskeletal diseases that could prevent the use of this method were excluded. The selected patients were randomized into two groups: Pilates and Control. The Pilates group (PG) had Pilates sessions three times a week for 12 weeks. The Control patients (CG) used a treadmill three times a week for 12 weeks. The treatment sessions in both groups lasted 50 minutes and the groups were instructed to use acetaminophen750 mg each 8 hours in case of pain, but the use was controlled. The evaluations were done by blind assessor at baseline (T0), 45 days (T45), 90 days (90) and 180 (T180) days after initiation of the study using the following instruments: for pain: NPS; Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), to evaluate the quality of life related to disease; Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for depression; The short form 36 (SF-36) to evaluate the quality of life in general; the 6-minutes walking test (6MWT) to evaluate the functional capacity; kinesiophobia scale (Tampa) to evaluate the fear of movement; Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), to evaluate catastrophizing and the Likert scale to evaluate the patient satisfaction towards the treatment.ResultsThirty four patients were randomized for the GP and 32 for the CG. The groups were homogeneous at baseline. In the comparison between groups over time, we found better results for PG with statistical differences when compared to CG for: pain (p<0,001), disease-related quality of life (p<0,001), psychological status (p=0,026), some domains of SF-36 – pain (p=0,014) and general health status (p<0,044), kinesiophobia scale (p<0,001), reduction in analgesic consumption (p=0,042) and on the Likert scale (p=0,003).ConclusionPilates method is effective in the treatment of women with FM, presenting pain improvement, quality of life related to the disease, psychological status, the SF-36 (pain, general health) domains, the kinesiophobia scale, the analgesic consumption reduction and satisfaction with treatment with better results when compared to walking.References[1]Castel A, Fontova R, Montull S, et al. Efficacy of a multidisciplinary fibromyalgia treatment adapted for women with low educational levels: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Mar;65(3):421-31.[2]Macfarlane GJ, Kronisch C, Dean LE, Atzeni F, W Häuser, E Fluß, et al. EULAR revised recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia. BMJ Journals. 2017. Annals of the rheumatic disease. Vol. 76, Issue 2. Disponível em:https://ard.bmj.com/content/76/2/318.[3]Byrnes K, Wu Ping-Jung, Whillier S. Is Pilates an effective rehabilitation tool? A systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Jan;22(1):192-202.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.