This study provides evidence that anandamide and PEA induce peripheral antinociception activating CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors, respectively, stimulating an endogenous norepinephrine release that activates peripheral adrenoceptors inducing antinociception.

Extracts from Lychnophora species are traditionally used in Brazil as anti-inflammatory, and to treat bruise, pain and rheumatism. The ethanolic extract of aerial parts of five species of Lychnophoras and one specie of Lychnophoriopsis were examined for the antinociceptive (hot-plate and writhing tests) and anti-inflammatory (carrageenan-induced paw oedema test) activity in mice, by oral and topical routes, respectively. In the hot-plate test, the Lychnophora pinaster (0.75 g/kg) and Lychnophora ericoides (1.50 g/kg) extracts significantly increased the time for licking of the paws. The species Lychnophora passerina, Lychnophoriopsis candelabrum and Lychnophora pinaster, using the dose of 0.75 g/kg, and Lychnophora ericoides and Lychnophora trichocarpha in both doses evaluated (0.75 and 1.50 g/kg) significantly reduced the number of writhes induced by acetic acid. The administration of Lychnophora pinaster and Lychnophora trichocarpha ointments, in both concentrations evaluated (5 and 10%, w/w), and Lychnophora passerina and Lychnophoriopsis candelabrum, in the concentration of 10%, significantly reduced the paw oedema measured 3 h after carrageenan administration, suggesting, for the first time, an anti-inflammatory activity upon topical administration of these species. The present work comparatively demonstrated the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of some Brazilian Lychnophoras.

The G protein-coupled receptor Mas was recently described as an angiotensin-(1–7) [Ang-(1–7)] receptor. In the present study, we demonstrate an antinociceptive effect of Ang-(1–7) for the first time. Additionally, we evaluated the anatomical localization of Mas in the dorsal root ganglia using immunofluorescence. This is the first evidence indicating that this receptor is present in sensitive neurons. The antinociceptive effect was demonstrated using the rat paw pressure test. For this test, sensitivity is increased by intraplantar injection of prostaglandin E₂. Ang-(1–7) administered locally into the right hind paw elicited a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect. Because the higher dose of Ang-(1–7) did not produce an effect when injected into the contralateral paw, this effect was considered local. The specific antagonist for the Mas receptor, A-779, inhibited the peripheral antinociception induced by exposure to 4 µg/paw Ang-(1–7) in a dose-dependent manner. The highest dose completely reversed the antinociceptive effect induced by Ang-(1–7), suggesting that the Mas receptor is an obligatory component in this process and that other angiotensin receptors may not be involved. When injected alone, the antagonist was unable to induce hyperalgesia or antinociception. Alternatively, naloxone was unable to inhibit the antinociceptive effect induced by Ang-(1–7), suggesting that endogenous opioid peptides may not be involved in this response. These data provide the first anatomical basis for the physiological role of Ang-(1–7) in the modulation of pain perception via Mas receptor activation in an opioid-independent pathway. Taken together, these results provide new perspectives for the development of a new class of analgesic drugs.

Opioid receptor agonists induce noradrenaline release in the supraspinal, spinal, and peripheral sites. Endogenous noradrenaline release can induce an antinociceptive effect by activation of the α(2) adrenoceptor. This interaction between the opioid and the adrenergic systems could be the alternative mechanism by which opioid receptor agonists mediate peripheral antinociception. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to verify whether peripheral antinociception induced by the μ, δ, and κ opioid receptor agonists DAMGO, SNC80, and bremazocine, respectively, through the endogenous noradrenergic system. All drugs were administered locally into the right hind paw of male Wistar rats. The rat paw pressure test was used, with hyperalgesia induced by intraplantar injection of prostaglandin E(2). DAMGO, SNC80, or bremazocine elicited local dose-dependent peripheral antinociception. This peripheral effect was antagonized by the nonselective α(2) adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine and by the selective α(2C) adrenoceptor antagonist rauwolscine but not by the selective antagonists for α(2A), α(2B), and α(2D) adrenoceptor subtypes (BRL 44 480, imiloxan, and RX 821002, respectively). The opioid-induced effect was antagonized by the nonselective α(1) adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin and by the nonselective β adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol. Guanethidine, a depletor of peripheral sympathomimetic amines, restored approximately 50-60% of the opioid-induced peripheral antinociception. Furthermore, acute injection of the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor reboxetine intensified the antinociceptive effects of low-dose DAMGO, SNC80, or bremazocine. This study provides evidence that DAMGO, SNC80, or bremazocine induces peripheral antinociception by noradrenaline release and interaction with adrenoceptors.

No abstract