Basilar artery fenestration aneurysms are rare and complex lesions. Endovascular treatment appears to be safe and efficient. The detailed understanding of the aneurysm morphology and its relation to the fenestration is strongly recommended to treatment planning. Further studies are necessary to validate the utility of the proposed classification and treatment strategy.

Background and Purpose— Flow diverter technology improvements are necessary to provide safe and good results and enable the treatment of a larger variety of aneurysms. We report a nationwide experience with the Derivo Embolization Device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Methods— BRAIDED (Brazilian Registry of Aneurysms Assigned to Intervention With the Derivo Embolization Device) is a multicenter, prospective, interventional, single-arm trial of the Derivo Embolization Device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The primary effectiveness end point was total aneurysm occlusion at 6- and 12-month angiographies. The secondary safety end point was the absence of serious adverse events during follow-up. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of aneurysm persistence, periprocedural complications, and adverse events during follow-up. Results— Between December 2016 and October 2018, 146 patients harboring 183 intracranial aneurysms were treated in 151 interventions at 7 centers. Derivo Embolization Device placement was technically successful in all patients. Most aneurysms (86.9%) were located at the internal carotid artery, and the mean diameter was 6.7 mm. At 6 months, 113 of 140 (80.7%) aneurysms met the study’s primary end point, and 74 of 83 (89.2%) met the study’s primary end point at 12 months. Saccular morphology of the aneurysm (odds ratio, 5.66; 95% CI, 1.01–31.77) and the presence of a branch arising from the sac (odds ratio, 6.36; 95% CI, 2.11–22.36) predicted persistence. A long duration of follow-up (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78–0.95) predicted total occlusion. Of the 146 enrolled patients, 138 (94.5%) were treated without serious adverse events during follow-up. In the multivariable analysis, aneurysms located at a sidewall were less likely to experience these events than those located at bifurcations (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01–0.51). Conclusions— The Derivo Embolization Device is a safe and effective treatment for intracranial aneurysms. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://plataformabrasil.saude.gov.br/login.jsf . Unique identifier: CAAE 77089717.7.1001.5125.

BACKGROUND The safety and efficacy of the first generation of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; Medtronic Inc) have been proven in large case series. Ischemic events are one of the most common complications following treatment of aneurysms with flow diverters. The new PED Flex with Shield technology (PED Shield; Medtronic Inc) was introduced to minimize the rate of complications. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the outcomes of patients harboring aneurysms treated with the PED Shield. METHODS This was an observational, prospective, single-arm multicenter study of patients treated with the PED Shield. The primary safety endpoint was the absence of major neurological complications and death. The secondary effectiveness endpoint was angiographic occlusion at 6 and 12 mo. Technical complications were also reported. RESULTS Between November 2017 and December 2018, 151 patients from 7 centers with 182 aneurysms were enrolled. The mean aneurysm size was 7.0 mm; 27 (14.8%) aneurysms were large, and 7 (3.8%) were giant. In 141 of 151 patients (93.4%), the primary endpoint was reached. The overall rate of periprocedural complications was 7.3%. Of the aneurysms, 79.7% met the study's secondary endpoint of complete occlusion at 6 mo and 85.3% at 12 mo. CONCLUSION The PED Shield is a safe and effective treatment for intracranial aneurysms. The results regarding total occlusion and ischemic complications did not differ from those obtained in case series using previous versions of the PED. Long-term follow-up and comparative studies are required to provide stronger conclusions regarding the reduced thrombogenicity of this device.

No abstract

No abstract