Lack of p27kip1 and p53 protein expression in rectal cancer is associated with a poor response to preoperative adjuvant therapy.
Aims In chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), tools based on objective evidence, such as histopathology, are needed to assist clinical decision‐making. The main aim of this exploratory investigation was to determine whether structured histopathology could be used to classify CRSwNP in homogeneous histological clusters. Methods and results A cohort of 135 CRSwNP patients was assessed, on the basis of clinicopathological features: allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (17 patients); non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug‐exacerbated respiratory disease (19 patients); intrinsic asthma (18 patients); extrinsic asthma (21 patients); allergy (21 patients); histologically eosinophilic (22 patients); and histologically non‐eosinophilic (17 patients). For structured histopathology, we considered: the degree of inflammation; eosinophil count; eosinophil aggregates; neutrophil infiltration; goblet cell hyperplasia; basement membrane thickening; fibrosis; hyperplastic/papillary changes; squamous metaplasia; mucosal ulceration; and subepithelial oedema. Cluster analysis identified four distinct sets of cases. On discriminant analysis, the global error rate was 1.48%, and the stratified error rates were 4.34%, 0%, 0%, and 0% for clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Cluster 1 was characterised by infrequent fibrosis (<4.5% of cases). Cluster 2 mainly featured neutrophil infiltration in 100% of cases, hyperplastic/papillary changes in 70% of cases, and fibrosis in 65% of cases. Cluster 3 showed fibrosis in 100% of cases. Cluster 4 showed hyperplastic/papillary changes in 100% of cases, and fibrosis in 92% of cases. Conclusions This study shows that cluster analysis can identify different histotypes among CRSwNP patients. The next step will be to investigate, in a larger series, the clinical (e.g. prognostic) implications of identifying such homogeneous clusters of patients with CRSwNP on the basis of their structured histopathology.
Background Very few studies have compared blood eosinophil and basophil levels before and after surgery in patients with eosinophilic CRSwNP (eCRSwNP). No investigations seem to have repeatedly measured them pre- and postoperatively in eCRSwNP patients with recurring versus non-recurring disease to examine how their levels evolved. Objective Hence this study to analyze blood eosinophil and basophil levels in patients with eCRSwNP immediately before surgery and afterwards, at 4 months, 1 year, and then yearly up to 5 years. Methods Fifty-one eCRSwNP patients were enrolled, who all had preoperative laboratory data and the results of at least 4 of the 6 scheduled postoperative follow-up tests. Results Seventeen patients had recurrent disease. Blood eosinophil counts (p = 0.005) and percentages (p = 0.002) were both higher in these patients than in those whose eCRSwNPs did not recur after surgery. Blood basophil counts (p = 0.04) and percentages (p < 0.05) were also significantly higher in patients whose eCRSwNPs relapsed. The time by relapse interaction was not significant for either counts or percentages, though an effect of time was detected for basophil counts (p = 0.01). Conclusions In eCRSwNP, the statistical analysis of repeated quantitative laboratory data can shed light on the evolution of a patient’s systemic inflammatory picture in response to previous treatments, and above all to long-term therapies. Long-term monitoring of blood eosinophil and basophil levels could be of significant value when monoclonal antibodies that inhibit IL signaling will widely enter in clinical practice for eCRSwNP treatment to follow the effectiveness of therapy over time.
Objectives To evaluate and compare the oncological and functional outcomes of total laryngectomies (TL) performed as first line treatment or for salvage after failure of conservative approaches for treating advanced laryngeal carcinoma (LSCC). Study Design A retrospective cohort study. Methods A cohort of 217 patients who underwent TL was divided according to whether the procedure was for primary treatment of their LSCC (101 patients) or for recurrences after conservative surgery or chemo‐radiotherapy (116 patients). Results The overall survival rate and disease‐specific survival rate were significantly higher in the primary TL group than in the salvage TL group (P = .04 and P = .01, respectively). The recurrence rate was significantly higher and the disease‐free survival (in months) was shorter for patients who had salvage TL than for those who had primary TL (P = .00 and P = .01, respectively). The salvage TL group also included significantly more cases of postoperative pharyngo‐cutaneous fistula needing salivary stent positioning, and experienced significantly longer hospital stays than the primary TL group (P = .04 and P = .03, respectively). Conclusion Oncological and functional outcomes of primary TL were significantly better than after salvage TL. If salvage TL was performed after conservative surgery had failed, the oncological and functional results were better than after the failure of organ‐preserving protocols. This could justify a first attempt at conservative surgery for intermediate‐advanced LSCC in selected cases, reserving chemo‐radiotherapy only for patients unsuitable for surgery. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E569–E575, 2021
Purpose: To evaluate stapedotomy learning curve with cumulative summation methodology using different success criteria (ie, air-bone gap [ABG] ≤10 dB, ABG ≤15 dB, restoration of interaural symmetry, or hearing threshold gain >20 dB), and to assess patient characteristics influencing or modifying the learning curve. Methods: Retrospective chart review of primary and revision stapedotomy cases performed by surgeon 1 (S1, n = 78) and surgeon 2 (S2, n = 85). Results: Using the classic criterion for a successful stapedotomy (ABG ≤10 dB), patients with preoperative ABG >34 dB were associated with unsuccessful procedures (S1 P = .02; S2 P = .07). Revision surgery was associated with unsuccessful outcomes (S1 P = .005; S2 P = .0012). Cumulative summation plots using different criteria did not show a linear trend of association between stapedotomy success and number of operations, but preoperative characteristics of the patients who underwent stapedotomy significantly influenced the plots. Cumulative summation plots showed an initial increasing tendency with improving results, but when ear surgeons got more skilled, they operated on more complex cases (ie, patients with higher preoperative ABG or revision stapedotomy) and they could not meet the success criteria. Conclusions: Cumulative summation plots do not seem useful to evaluate the stapedotomy learning curve, as they do not correctly deal with heterogeneous case series. The increasing complexity of the stapedotomy patients during the surgeons’ career impacts on the outcome of stapedotomy and confounds the evaluation of the growing skills of the surgeon. Stapedotomy audiological success rates are strongly influenced by the success criteria used.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.