No abstract

BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver transplantation (LT) is a frequent and multifactorial event related to increased morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for AKI after LT still need to be clarified. AIM To identify the predictors of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation. METHODS The frequency and pre- and intraoperative predictors of AKI within the first 7 d after LT were evaluated in adult liver transplant candidates in a single LT center in Croatia. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. RESULTS Out of 205 patients (mean age 57 ± 10 years; 73.7% males, 52.7% with alcohol-related liver disease) 93 (45.36%) developed AKI, and the majority of them (58.06%) had stage 1. Only 5.38% of patients required renal replacement therapy after LT. The majority of patients (82.8%) developed AKI within the first two days after the procedure. Multivariate logistic regression identified pre-LT body mass index (OR = 1.1, 95%CI: 1.05-1.24) and red blood cell transfusion (OR = 1.66, 95%CI: 1.09-2.53) as independent predictors of early post-LT AKI occurrence. 30-d survival after LT was significantly better for patients without AKI ( P = 0.01). CONCLUSION Early AKI after LT is a frequent event that negatively impacts short-term survival. The pathogenesis of AKI is multifactorial, but pre-LT BMI and intraoperative volume shifts are major contributors.

No abstract

BACKGROUNDDonor-origin cancer is a well-recognized but rare complication after liver transplantation (LT). The rise in the use of extended criteria donors due to the current shortage of organs increases the risk. Data on donor-origin neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and the most appropriate treatment are scarce. Here, we report a case of a patient who developed a NEN confined to the liver after LT and was treated with liver re-transplantation (re-LT).CASE SUMMARYA 49-year-old man with no other medical co-morbidities underwent LT in 2013 for alcoholic liver cirrhosis. The donor was a 73-year-old female with no known malignancies. Early after LT, a hypoechogenic (15 mm) lesion was detected in the left hepatic lobe on abdominal ultrasound. The lesion was stable for next 11 mo, when abdominal magnetic resonance identified two hypovascular lesions (20 and 11 mm) with atypical enhancement pattern. Follow-up abdominal ultrasound revealed no new lesions for the next 2.5 years, when magnetic resonance showed a progression in size and number of lesions, also confirmed by abdominal computed tomography. Liver biopsy proved a well-differentiated NEN. Genetic analysis of the NEN confirmed donor origin of the neoplasm. As NEN was confined to liver graft only, in 2018, the patient underwent his second LT. At 12 mo after re-LT the patient is well with no signs of NEN dissemination.CONCLUSIONThe benefits of graft explantation should be weighed against the risks of re-LT and the likelihood of NEN dissemination beyond the graft.

No abstract