Undergraduate research experiences (UREs) have the potential to benefit undergraduates and longer UREs have been shown to lead to greater benefits for students. However, no studies have examined what causes students to stay in or consider leaving their UREs. In this study, we examined what factors cause students to stay in their UREs, what factors cause students to consider leaving their UREs, and what factors cause students to leave their UREs. We sampled from 25 research-intensive (R1) public universities across the United States and surveyed 768 life sciences undergraduates who were currently participating in or had previously participated in a URE. Students answered closed-ended and open-ended questions about factors that they perceived influenced their persistence in UREs. We used logistic regression to explore to what extent student demographics predicted what factors influenced students to stay in or consider leaving their UREs. We applied open-coding methods to probe the student-reported reasons why students chose to stay in and leave their UREs. Fifty percent of survey respondents considered leaving their URE, and 53.1% of those students actually left their URE. Students who reported having a positive lab environment and students who indicated enjoying their everyday research tasks were more likely to not consider leaving their UREs. In contrast, students who reported a negative lab environment or that they were not gaining important knowledge or skills were more likely to leave their UREs. Further, we identified that gender, race/ethnicity, college generation status, and GPA predicted which factors influenced students’ decisions to persist in their UREs. This research provides important insight into how research mentors can create UREs that undergraduates are willing and able to participate in for as long as possible.

Future studies are needed to confirm our findings utilizing another environmental matrix such as soil/sediments and air samples.

Three different Western Canadian coals were gasified with air and steam in a fluidized bed of 0.73 mm Ottawa sand and coal, at atmospheric pressure, and temperatures of 1023-1175 K to produce a low Btu gas. The coals •:, tested were of two types: one non-caking and two caking coals. The results were compared with those previously obtained for the same three coals when gasified in essentially the same equipment, but operated as a spouted bed. The effects of temperature, coal feed rate, air to coal ratio, steam to coal ratio, coal quality, coal particle size, and bed depth on the gas composition, gas calorific value and the operating stability of the gasifier, were established by running gasification tests over a wide range of operating conditions. Typical calorific value of the gas obtained for all three coals was in the range of 2.0-2.6 MJ/m , which is lower than reported for the spouted bed and commercially available fluidized bed gasifiers. Analysis of the results suggested that in the present low temperature gasifier, the combustion on and pyrolysis reactions predominate over the gasification reactions. The ability to treat caking coals in fluidized bed and spouted bed reactors is discussed. It is concluded that the dispersion of coal in a bed of inert silica and ash, rather than hydrodynamic characteristics is the key-factor in their success ,in handling caking coals.

No abstract

No abstract