No abstract

This paper describes the conceptual design of a micro coaxial unmanned aerial vehicle (MCR UAV v3.0) based on its flight dynamics and a simple aerodynamic analysis using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). In addition, a simple linear control is proposed with the pole assignment technique. The methodology proposed in this paper involves a standardized path for designing the novel micro coaxial UAV. This begins by selecting the avionics to create a primary dimensional design for a later transient and stationary CFD analysis. In effect, the mathematical model is obtained using the Newton–Euler formulation and is linearized to obtain the dynamical requirements of the vehicle. The requirements allow us to design the control scheme with a linear control technique. This process is iterative and uses a combination of flight dynamics and CFD. The control technique is based on pole assignment, ensuring a specific phase condition is used in the controller gain for the stabilization of the proposed aerial vehicle. The control scheme is analyzed once the CFD analysis is correctly performed; in this sense, the methodology proposed in this paper is capable of converging as a result of the dimensional design. This design ensures a suitable vehicle performance according to the dynamical requirements. Thus, the micro coaxial UAV is completely designed based on its flight dynamics along with a CFD analysis, generating a robust methodology.

Stator-currents control is essential for several high-performance induction motor control schemes such as field oriented control. There are numerous reports dealing with sophisticated control schemes for this subsystem. However, classical linear controllers remain widely used due to their experimental success and simplicity. Considering that the induction motor stator currents subsystem is normally represented by a fifth order non-linear multivariable model, it is remarkable that simple fixed linear controllers, such as typical proportional integral schemes, are able to provide adequate robustness and performance in practice. In fact, it is normally assumed that this subsystem is "easy" to control, and the difficulties are mostly technical. Moreover, it is common practice to consider a stable first order linear single input single output (SISO) system as a design model. On the other hand, it is widely known that stable and minimum phase uncertain SISO systems are also "easy" to control. In this article it is formally demonstrated that the stator currents subsystem of the induction motor is the multivariable equivalent of such SISO systems. That is, it is formally demonstrated that this process is "easy" to control. This result may assist with better induction motor control and may serve as an example of the evaluation of similar multivariable systems. Real time experimental results are included.

No abstract

The adequate control of stator currents is a fundamental requirement for several high-performance induction motor (IM) control schemes. In this context, classical linear controllers remain widely employed due to their simplicity and success in industrial applications. However, the models and methods commonly used for control design lack valuable information, which is fundamental to guarantee robustness and high performance. Following this line, the design and existence of linear fixed controllers is examined using individual channel analysis and design. The studies presented here aim to establish guidelines for the design of simple (time invariant, low order, stable, minimum phase, and decentralized) yet robust and highperformance linear controllers. Such characteristics ease the implementation task and are well suited for engineering applications, making the resulting controllers a good alternative for the stator current control required for highperformance IM schemes such as field-oriented, passivitybased, and intelligent control. Illustrative examples are presented to demonstrate the analysis and controller design of an IM, with results validated in a real-time experimental platform. It is shown that it is possible to completely decouple the stator current subsystem without the use of additional decoupling elements.