No abstract

Introduction Autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) is the most common autoimmune disorder worldwide. Remarkably, it is commonly accompanied by other autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The immunopathogenic mechanisms behind the coexistence of these disorders are still not completely understood. Immunogenetics influences the physiopathology of these diseases since ethnicity plays an essential role in the inheritance of susceptibility markers. Methods High-resolution HLA class II typing was performed using a sequence-based method. Results The allele frequency of HLA-DRB1∗04:04 and -DRB1∗03:01 were significantly increased in patients with AITD and RA compared to healthy individuals, pC ​= ​0.021, OR ​= ​2.4, 95%CI ​= ​1.19–4.75 and pC ​= ​0.009, OR ​= ​3.4, 95%CI ​= ​1.42–7.93, respectively. Remarkably, these patients have a combined risk given by susceptibility HLA-DRB1 alleles that contain the shared epitope, pC ​= ​0.03, OR ​= ​1.7, IC95% ​= ​1.07–2.76, and a lack of protective alleles carrying aspartic acid 70 , pC ​= ​0.009, OR ​= ​0.5, IC95% ​= ​0.32–0.84. Discussion The results suggest that patients with AITD and RA have an immunogenetic mechanism that combines the susceptibility alleles associated with both diseases. Importantly, it seems to be linked mainly to the lack of protective alleles with aspartic acid in the position 70, along with the presence of susceptibility alleles that have the sequences QRRAA, QKRAA, and RRRAA at positions 70–74. Conclusion Patients with AITD and RA have a characteristic immunogenetic signature, which could be useful for determining multiple autoimmunities and assessing their relatives’ risk of developing it.

Background/Objective The aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore which factors affect the impact of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MUS) on the treatment proposal among rheumatologists with different degree of experience. Methods Sixteen clinical vignettes summarized data from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) outpatients; vignettes included clinical evaluation and a blank section for a first treatment proposal; MUS information was then added, based on German Ultrasound score, followed by a blank section for treatment re-consideration, if applicable. During a 6 months period, each vignette was concomitantly presented to six trainees and six senior rheumatologists (SR); three SR had ≥15 years of experience. Participants were blinded to colleagues’ responses. Appropriated statistics were used. Results Vignettes included data from female patients, who had a mean ± SD age of 43.3 ± 9 years, 7.6 ± 3.5 years of disease duration and comorbidities (68.8%). MUS induced treatment modification in 24% of evaluations, with similar percentage among SR and trainees. Within SR, more experienced rheumatologists (≥15 years) never translated MUS findings in a different treatment proposal, compared to 34% of those with lesser experience, p ≤ 0.0001. There were 60 clinical scenarios each, with remission and moderate disease activity, and 36 clinical scenarios each, with low and high disease activity. MUS-induced treatment modifications were more frequent in scenarios with low and moderate disease activity, compared to remission and high disease activity, p = 0.008. Conclusions Physician’s experience and disease activity level affect the impact of MUS on the treatment decision in RA outpatients. RA patients with intermediate disease activity may benefit from MUS incorporation to standard assessments.