No abstract

Background: The removal of all adherent muscle tissue from the hamstring graft during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is common practice. However, there is a paucity of research to justify this removal or evaluate its biological implications. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate the histological characteristics of the myotendinous muscle tissue harvested from hamstring tendons, (2) compare the final diameter of the prepared graft before and after the removal of the remnant musculature, and (3) evaluate patients who were treated with and without preservation of the graft-adhered muscle. The hypothesis was that the adherent musculature of the graft would have cells that could contribute to graft incorporation and revascularization, assist in the proprioceptive capacity of the neoligament, and increase the graft’s diameter. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We divided 84 patients into 2 groups: group 1 underwent ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft with adherent musculature, and group 2 underwent ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft stripped of its remnant muscle. All patients had minimum 2-year follow-up. The muscle harvested from the graft in group 2 was submitted for histological examination, and the graft diameter before and after muscle removal was compared. The Tegner activity scale and Lysholm scores were determined preoperatively and at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Results: There was a significant difference in graft diameter between groups. The evaluation of the graft diameter in group 2 showed a decrease of 11.52% after removal of muscle tissue from the tendon graft. Patients from group 1 had better Tegner and Lysholm scores (mean ± SD) after 12 months (Tegner, 8.03 vs 7 [ P = .004]; Lysholm, 95.48 ± 1.2 vs 87.54 ± 3.21 [ P = .002]) and better Lysholm scores after 24 months (95.76 ± 2.1 vs 89.32 ± 2.47; P = .002). The muscle tissue of the analyzed fragments presented a pattern with fibrous tissue beams, invaginating regularly and sequentially from the myotendinous junction into the muscles. Conclusion: Preserving the muscle tissue on tendon grafts promoted a volumetric increase in the final autograft diameter and demonstrated biological and regenerative potential. Patients who underwent ACLR using the tendon with the muscle attached had better functional scores at 2-year follow-up as compared with patients treated using the tendon with the muscle removed.

Purpose (1) To evaluate the biomechanical properties of a porcine flexor digitorum superficialis tendon graft with preserved muscle fibers and (2) to compare these results with the biomechanical properties of a porcine tendon graft after removal of associated muscle. Methods Eighty-two porcine forelegs were dissected and the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle tendons were harvested. The study comprised of two groups: Group 1 (G1), harvested tendon with preserved muscle tissue; and Group 2 (G2), harvested contralateral tendon with removal of all muscle tissue. Tests in both groups were conducted using an electro-mechanical material testing machine (Instron, model 23-5S, Instron Corp., Canton, MA, USA) with a 500 N force transducer. Yield load, stiffness, and maximum load were evaluated and compared between groups. Results The behavior of the autografts during the tests followed the same stretching, deformation, and failure patterns as those observed in human autografts subjected to axial strain. There were no significant differences in the comparison between groups for ultimate load to failure (p = 0.105), stiffness (p = 0.097), and energy (p = 0.761). Conclusion In this porcine model biomechanical study, using autograft tendon with preserved muscle showed no statistically significant differences for yield load, stiffness, or maximum load compared to autograft tendon without preserved muscle. The preservation of muscle on the autograft tendon did not compromise the mechanical properties of the autograft. Level of evidence Level III Controlled laboratory study