The improvement of pulmonary function and the restoration of sagittal and coronal balance are the main goals in the treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis. A review of the literature showed that HGT is a useful tool for selected patients. Preoperative HGT is indicated in severe curves with moderate to severe pulmonary compromise. HGT should not be expected to significantly improve severe curves without a prior anterior and/or posterior release. The data presented in this study can be used in future studies to compare the surgical and pulmonary outcomes of severe and rigid deformities.

In the future, there will be an increased number of cervical revision surgeries, including 4-and more-levels. But, there is a paucity of literature concerning the geometrical and clinical outcome in these challenging reconstructions. To contribute to current knowledge, we want to share our experience with 4-and 5-level anterior cervical fusions in 26 cases in sight of a critical review of literature. At index procedure, almost 50% of our patients had previous cervical surgeries performed. Besides failed prior surgeries, indications included degenerative multilevel instability and spondylotic myelopathy with cervical kyphosis. An average of 4.1 levels was instrumented and fused using constrained (26.9%) and non-constrained (73.1%) screw-plate systems. At all, four patients had 3-level corpectomies, and three had additional posterior stabilization and fusion. Mean age of patients at index procedure was 54 years with a mean follow-up intervall of 30.9 months. Preoperative lordosis C2-7 was 6.5°in average, which measured a mean of 15.6°at last follow-up. Postoperative lordosis at fusion block was 14.4°in average, and 13.6°at last follow-up. In 34.6% of patients some kind of postoperative change in construct geometry was observed, but without any catastrophic construct failure. There were two delayed unions, but finally union rate was 100% without any need for the Halo device. Eleven patients (42.3%) showed an excellent outcome, twelve good (46.2%), one fair (3.8%), and two poor (7.7%). The study demonstrated that anterior-only instrumentations following segmental decompressions or use of the hybrid technique with discontinuous corpectomies can avoid the need for posterior supplemental surgery in 4-and 5-level surgeries. However, also the review of literature shows that decreased construct rigidity following more than 2-level corpectomies can demand 360°instrumentation and fusion. Concerning construct rigidity and radiolographic course, constrained plates did better than non-constrained ones. The discussion of our results are accompanied by a detailed review of literature, shedding light on the biomechanical challenges in multilevel cervical procedures and suggests conclusions.

Only a few reports exist concerning biomechanical challenges spine surgeons face when treating Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with spinal deformity. We recognized patients suffering from spinal deformity aggravated by the burden of PD to stress the principles of sagittal balance in surgical treatment. Treatment of sagittal imbalance in PD is difficult due to brittle bone and (the neuromuscular disorder) with postural dysfunction. We performed a retrospective review of 23 PD patients treated surgically for spinal disorders. Mean ASA score was 2.3 (2-3). Outcome analysis included review of medical records focusing on failure characteristics, complications, and radiographic analysis of balance parameters to characterize special risk factors or precautions to be considered in PD patients. The sample included 15 female and 8 male PD patients with mean age of 66.3 years (57-76) at index surgery and 67.9 years (59-76) at follow-up. 10 patients (43.5%) presented with the sequels of failed previous surgery. 18 patients (78.3%) underwent multilevel fusion (C3 level) with 16 patients (69.6%) having fusion to S1, S2 or the Ilium. At a mean follow-up of 14.5 months (1-59) we noted medical complications in 7 patients (30.4%) and surgical complications in 12 patients (52.2%). C7-sagittal center vertical line was 12.2 cm (8-57) preoperatively, 6.9 cm postoperatively, and 7.6 cm at follow-up. Detailed analysis of radiographs, sagittal spinal, and spino-pelvic balance, stressed a positive C7 off-set of 10 cm on average in 25% of patients at follow-up requiring revision surgery in 4 of them. Statistical analysis revealed that patients with a postoperative or follow-up sagittal imbalance (C7-SVL [10 cm) had a significantly increased rate of revision done or scheduled (p = 0.03). Patients with revision surgery as index procedure also were found more likely to suffer postoperative or final sagittal imbalance (C7-SPL, 10 cm; p = 0.008). At all, 33% of patients had any early or late revision performed. Nevertheless, 78% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their clinical outcome, while 22% were either not satisfied or uncertain regarding their outcome. The surgical history of PD patients treated for spinal disorders and the reasons necessitating redo surgery for recalcitrant global sagittal imbalance in our sample stressed the mainstays of spinal surgery in Parkinson's: If spinal surgery is indicated, the reconstruction of spinopelvic balance with focus on lumbar lordosis and global sagittal alignment is required.

Retrospective review of 80 patients undergoing S2-ala screw fixation. Main diagnosis was degenerative lumbar instability, adult scoliosis, high-grade listhesis, and nonidiopathic scoliosis. In 66% of patients, the instrumentation using S2-ala screws was part of a major lumbosacral revision surgery. Follow-up averaged 26 months. There were no deaths or major neurovascular complications. First time fusion rate at L5-S1 was greater than 90%. Eight patients (10%) experienced a complication which could be related to the S2-ala screws. Out of 160 S2-ala screws, 16 screws were judged to cause focal irritation and were removed, indicating a survival rate of 90% for the S2-ala screw.

With the advent of thoracoscopy, anterior release procedures in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have come into more frequent use, however, the indication criteria for an anterior release in thoracic AIS are still controversial in the literature. To date, few studies have assessed the influence on spinal flexibility and no study has so far been able to show a beneficial effect on the correction rate as compared to a single posterior procedure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of thoracic disc excision on coronal spinal flexibility. Six patients (5 females, 1 male) with AIS and a mean age of 15.6 years (range 13-20 years) underwent an open anterior thoracic release prior to posterior instrumentation. Cotrel dynamic traction along with radiographs of the whole spine including traction films were conducted pre-and postoperatively and were evaluated retrospectively. The mean preoperative thoracic curve was 89.7°± 15.4°(range 65°-110°). The flexibility rate in Cotrel traction was 22.8 ± 8.1%. After performance of the anterior release the thoracic curve showed a mean increase of coronal correction by 5.5°± 5.0°as assessed by traction radiographs. The flexibility index changed by 6.2 ± 5.6%. After posterior instrumentation the thoracic curve was corrected to a mean of 36.5°± 10.1°(correction rate 59.6%). Disc excision in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis only slightly increased spinal flexibility as assessed by traction films. In our view a posterior release with osteotomy of the concave ribs (concave thoracoplasty, CTP) is more effective in increasing spinal flexibility. According to our clinical experience, an anterior release prior to posterior instrumentation in AIS should only be considered in hyperkyphosis, coronal imbalance or massive curves.