Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits bone resorption by neutralizing RANKL, a key mediator of osteoclast formation, function, and survival. This phase 3, multicenter, doubleblind study compared the efficacy and safety of denosumab with alendronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. One thousand one hundred eighty-nine postmenopausal women with a T-score Յ −2.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous denosumab injections (60 mg every 6 mo [Q6M]) plus oral placebo weekly (n ‫ס‬ 594) or oral alendronate weekly (70 mg) plus subcutaneous placebo injections Q6M (n ‫ס‬ 595). Changes in BMD were assessed at the total hip, femoral neck, trochanter, lumbar spine, and one-third radius at 6 and 12 mo and in bone turnover markers at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events and laboratory values. At the total hip, denosumab significantly increased BMD compared with alendronate at month 12 (3.5% versus 2.6%; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, significantly greater increases in BMD were observed with denosumab treatment at all measured skeletal sites (12-mo treatment difference: 0.6%, femoral neck; 1.0%, trochanter; 1.1%, lumbar spine; 0.6%, one-third radius; p Յ 0.0002 all sites). Denosumab treatment led to significantly greater reduction of bone turnover markers compared with alendronate therapy. Adverse events and laboratory values were similar for denosumab-and alendronate-treated subjects. Denosumab showed significantly larger gains in BMD and greater reduction in bone turnover markers compared with alendronate. The overall safety profile was similar for both treatments.

Although treat‐to‐target strategies are being discussed in osteoporosis, there is little evidence of what the target should be to reduce fracture risk maximally. We investigated the relationship between total hip BMD T‐score and the incidence of nonvertebral fracture in women who received up to 10 years of continued denosumab therapy in the FREEDOM (3 years) study and its long‐term Extension (up to 7 years) study. We report the percentages of women who achieved a range of T‐scores at the total hip or femoral neck over 10 years of denosumab treatment (1343 women completed 10 years of treatment). The incidence of nonvertebral fractures was lower with higher total hip T‐score. This relationship plateaued at a T‐score between ‐2.0 and ‐1.5 and was independent of age and prevalent vertebral fractures, similar to observations in treatment‐naïve subjects. Reaching a specific T‐score during denosumab treatment was dependent on the baseline T‐score, with higher T‐scores at baseline more likely to result in higher T‐scores at each time point during the study. Our findings highlight the importance of follow‐up BMD measurements in patients receiving denosumab therapy because BMD remains a robust indicator of fracture risk. These data support the notion of a specific T‐score threshold as a practical target for therapy in osteoporosis. © 2019 The Authors Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)

Within the parameters used in this animal model it was not possible to observe BIC differences between osteoporotic and healthy animals.

Background: Back pain is a major public health problem due to its high frequency, to the resulting activity constraint, and the need for surgery in many cases. Back pain is more frequent in women than men, mainly in postmenopausal women. High prevalence of hypovitaminosis D has been detected in postmenopausal women, and it is associated with decreased bone mass, sarcopenia, vertebral fractures, and inflammation, which can be related to back pain.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is the most frequent cause of secondary osteoporosis. Glucocorticoids cause a rapid bone loss in the first few months of use, but the most important effect of the drug is suppression of bone formation. The administration of oral glucocorticoid is associated with an increased risk of fractures at the spine and hip. The risk is related to the dose, but even small doses can increase the risk. Patients on glucocorticoid therapy lose more trabecular than cortical bone and the fractures are more frequent at the spine than at the hip. Calcium, vitamin D and activated forms of vitamin D can prevent bone loss and antiresorptive agents are effective for prevention and treatment of bone loss and to decrease fracture risk. Despite the known effects of glucocorticoids on bone, only a few patients are advised to take preventive measures and treat glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. RESUMOOsteoporose Induzida por Glicocorticóide. A osteoporose induzida por glicocorticóides é a causa mais freqüente de osteoporose secundária. Os glicocorticóides causam uma perda óssea rápida nos primeiros meses de uso da medicação; entretanto, o seu efeito mais importante é uma supressão significativa da formação óssea. A administração oral de glicocorticóides está associada a um aumento no risco de fraturas na coluna e no quadril. O risco é dose dependente; entretanto, mesmo doses baixas de glicocorticóides podem aumentar o risco de fraturas. Os pacientes em uso de glicocorticóides perdem mais osso trabecular que osso cortical; em conseqüên-cia, as fraturas são mais freqüentes na coluna que no quadril. O uso concomitante de cálcio e vitamina D ou formas ativas da vitamina D previne a perda óssea, e as drogas anti-reabsortivas são efetivas na prevenção e tratamento da perda óssea e diminuem o risco de fraturas. Apesar de os efeitos deletérios dos glicocorticóides sobre o osso serem bastante conhecidos, poucos pacientes são orientados ou recebem tratamento preventivo associado à terapia com glicocorticóides.