Introduction On February 26th 2020, a high alert was issued in Sweden in response to the diagnosis of the first few coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in the country. Subsequently, a decreased supply of essential goods, including medical products, was anticipated. We aimed to explore the weekly patterns of prescription dispensing and over-the-counter (OTC) medication sales in Sweden in 2020 compared with previous years, to assess the influence of the government restrictions on medication sales, and to assess whether there is evidence of medication stockpiling in the population. Methods Aggregated data on the weekly volume of defined daily doses (DDDs) of prescription medication dispensed and OTC sales from 2015 to 2020 were examined. From 2015–2019 data, the predicted weekly volume of DDDs for 2020 was estimated and compared to the observed volume for each ATC anatomical main group and therapeutic subgroup. Results From mid-February to mid-March 2020, there were increases in the weekly volumes of dispensed medication, peaking in the second week of March with a 46% increase in the observed versus predicted number of DDDs dispensed (16,440 vs 11,260 DDDs per 1000 inhabitants). A similar pattern was found in all age groups, in both sexes, and across metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions. In the same week in March, there was a 96% increase in the volume of OTC sold (2,504 vs 1,277 DDDs per 1000 inhabitants), specifically in ATC therapeutic subgroups including vitamins, antipyretics, painkillers, and nasal, throat, cough and cold preparations. Conclusion Beginning in mid-February 2020, there were significant changes in the volume of prescription medication dispensed and OTC drugs sold. The weekly volume of DDDs quickly decreased following recommendations from public authorities. Overall, our findings suggest stockpiling behavior over a surge in new users of medication.

Background The association between use of β-blockers and breast cancer (BC) prognosis has been investigated in several observational studies, with conflicting results. We performed a nationwide cohort study and a meta-analysis to investigate the association, and assess if it varied between molecular subtypes of BC. Methods We identified women aged ≥50 years with BC diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 in Norway. We used Cox regression models to estimate the association between β-blocker use at diagnosis and BC-specific survival, overall and by molecular subtype. We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies that reported molecular subtype-specific estimates of this association. Results We included 30,060 women, of which 4461 (15%) used β-blockers. After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 2826 (9%) died of BC. Overall, β-blocker use was not associated with BC-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97–1.19). We found an association only in triple-negative BC (TNBC) patients (HR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47–0.91). This was confirmed in the meta-analysis: β-blocker use was associated with progression/recurrence-free (HR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.38–0.89) and BC-specific survival (HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55–1.00) in TNBC patients only. Conclusion In our cohort of BC patients and in the meta-analysis, β-blocker use was associated with prolonged BC-specific survival only in TNBC patients.

Introduction: Approximately, 10-15% of lung cancer patients have never smoked. Previous epidemiological studies on non-tobacco associated lung cancer have been hampered by selected data from a small number of hospitals or limited numbers of patients. By use of data from large population-based registers with national coverage, this study aims to compare characteristics and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with different smoking histories. Methods: Swedish national population-based registers were used to retrieve data on patients diagnosed with primary NSCLC between 2002 and 2016. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate overall survival and lung cancer-specific survival by smoking history. Results: In total, 41,262 patients with NSCLC were included. Of those, 4624 (11%) had never smoked. Never-smokers were more often women and older compared to ever smokers (current and former). Adenocarcinoma was proportionally more common in never-smokers (77%) compared to current (52%) and former smokers (57%). Stage IV disease was more common in neversmokers (57%) than in current (48%) and former smokers (48%). Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation was observed more in never-smokers (37%) compared to current (5%) and former smokers (9%). Both lung cancer-specific and overall survival were higher for never-smokers compared to current smokers. Conclusions: The observed differences in characteristics between never-smokers and smokers, and the higher survival in never-smokers compared to smokers from this large population-based study provide further evidence that lung cancer in never-smokers is clinically different to tobacco-associated lung cancer. The findings from this study emphasise the need for an improved understanding of genetics, pathogenesis, mechanisms and progression of non-tobacco associated lung cancer that may help prevent lung cancer or identify individually targeted treatments. ARTICLE HISTORY

Background Increased and inappropriate antimicrobial use are the key drivers of the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, and there have been widespread concerns around potential antimicrobial misuse, overuse and their consequences during the COVID-19 pandemic. To better understand the impact of the pandemic on antimicrobial use, particularly in light of the resurgence of COVID-19 cases since the summer of 2020, we assessed trends in antimicrobial prescription fills and hospital requisitions in Sweden during 2020 against those of preceding years. Methods We performed a descriptive study using population-based data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and the Swedish e-Health Agency. The weekly number of prescriptions filled and the total volume sold to inpatient care institutions in defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1000 inhabitants for systemic antibacterials (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical therapeutic subgroup J01 excluding J01XX), antimycotics (J02), antivirals (J05) and antiprotozoals (P01) were computed and evaluated from time series graphs. A time series linear regression with ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation was used to model 2015–2019 data and predict the expected number of prescriptions filled and volumes sold in DDDs per 1000 inhabitants during 2020 with 95% confidence limits. Results From mid-March 2020, the weekly rate of antibiotic and antiprotozoal prescriptions filled plummeted to unprecedentedly low levels for the rest of the year; while unprecedentedly high numbers of antiviral prescriptions were filled weekly between mid-February and mid-March 2020. There was a net reduction in annual dispensing of antibiotics by 17%; of antiprotozoals by 21%; and of antivirals by 0.3% during 2020 compared to 2019. Inpatient care requisitions of antiprotozoals and antibiotics surged to 6-year highs during March 2020, resulting in a 127% increase in DDDs of antiprotozoals sold from 2019. The volume of antibiotics and antivirals sold to inpatient care institutions in 2020 decreased by 3% and 13% compared to 2019, respectively. Conclusions The overall decline in antimicrobial prescriptions filled in Sweden during 2020 were in part, collateral dividends of the COVID-19 pandemic.